English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Cause I sure as hell do Have any of you ever seen loose change 1 st & 2nd eddition If not see It it just may open your eyes and change your mind about the way you think about 9-11

2007-02-21 06:11:14 · 8 answers · asked by ::♥Breezeway♥:: 2 in News & Events Other - News & Events

8 answers

Yes, I agree with you. Something just doesn't seem right. There are those who say that investigating this theory is disrespectful to the victims. Yet, I can't help wondering why. Is it not more disrespectful to blind ourselves to facts that may be presented to us - some, actually, by the immediate families of the victims? I've never heard of this "Loose Change" you refer to in your question, but thanks for the tip. To me, the only correct way to honor the memories of the victims of 9-11 is to learn as much as possible about what happened to them on that (unspeakably ) horrible day. Hopefully, we will discover the whole truth someday. If not, too many innocent people may continue to "pay" for a crime they did not commit. And, how wrong is that?

2007-02-21 08:08:25 · answer #1 · answered by 1staricy2nite 4 · 0 0

Exactly what the conspiracy was and how deep it goes I don't know, but I know there are a lot of unanswered questions about our government's involvement with the people allegedly responsible for it, and about the way they handled the whole thing. I think there's a lot that the public isn't being told, and IMO, if the truth ever comes out we're going to find that some pretty high-up officials were involved in it before the fact (conspiracy) *and* after (cover up).

2007-02-21 14:58:45 · answer #2 · answered by pookieb 3 · 0 0

There are sooooo...... many strange anomaly’s,
Bushes younger brother was directly involved in the company that provided security to the Towers.
The geometry of the collapse was uncanny.
The owner of the building Larry Silverstein acquired the buildings 3 months before the attack, reinsured them and profited millions.
His offices were in the towers , he was supposed to be in the towers on 9/11 as well as two daughters that worked there , they were not.
Bushes cousin was scheduled for a meeting in one of the towers on 9/11 but the meeting was moved to another building at the last moment.
Close Ties between the Bush family and the Bin Laudins.
Free pass to selected Saudis out of the country when air space was totally shut down.
Intelligence warning of an imminent attack that was ignored.
Confusion in the military and air control caused by war games in progress.
Un explicable and unprecedented collapse of building seven also owned by Silverman.
Masses of molten metal found in the debris.
Exporting all of the metal debris to China without analysis.
Unprecedented short selling of the airline stocks just before the attacks which was investigated but the results of the investigation have been withheld to this day
The list goes on and on.
I have always been a skeptic of the demolition theorists regarding the towers however building seven has never looked right to me.
The reason I have been skeptical of demolition in the towers is that they appeared to be top down rather than bottom up as is the case of controlled demolition. Plus the logistics of synchronizing demolition from the location of the impact of the air liners just seemed to me to be so astronomically complex as to render such a notion totally implausible.
That said I recently read this article pasted in the source box below which made me take stock regarding the feasibility of controlled demolition. Does not prove anything one way or anouther but does raise the question of feasability to a higher level.
Many, many, many, documents were withheld from the 9/11 commission for “reasons of National security” and IMO most of these documents have probably been shreaded long ago..
Chances are we will never know but one thing we may rest assured of is that the possibility will haunt many of us forever.

2007-02-21 15:15:43 · answer #3 · answered by Daniel O 3 · 0 1

I think personally that that is a horrible way to look at the tragedy that happened. We do not have a government that would cover-up knowing that this would happen, and then letting it happen. I'm not saying that it is the perfect government, but in all honesty, which presidential reign ever has been? And what kind of disrespect is that not only to be blaming all those lost lives on our government, but for the sake of the people mourning still over the loss of loved ones. I think that thinking 911 was a conspiracy is an irrational, disrespectful, and selfish way to think.

2007-02-21 14:20:31 · answer #4 · answered by toonlink 5 · 1 1

I'm not sure about the "conspiracy" aspect of it, but it was strange how those planes were on radar the whole time and no one shot them down. I know that sounds harsh, but 80 people is far less of a loss than 6000. Our government is covering up something, but we'll never find out about it. Everyone who has gone against the government has "disappeared." Our government is very corrupt and is responsible for many disasters. I wouldn't be surprised if it comes out the entire thing was a conspiracy. Thank you and may GOD help us all.

2007-02-21 14:22:16 · answer #5 · answered by cookie 6 · 0 1

Something sure stinks in the unanswered questions. I typed in 911 on search engine and got a mass of info that kept me reading for a couple of days

2007-02-21 14:21:20 · answer #6 · answered by mohayrix 3 · 0 2

That is a ridiculous theory and an insult to the victims.

2007-02-21 14:21:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Grow up.

2007-02-21 14:18:45 · answer #8 · answered by penhead72 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers