English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I saw the movie and I also read the book, It left me more confuse.
And I was just wondering.

2007-02-21 05:47:19 · 6 answers · asked by Berryblue 1 in Arts & Humanities Books & Authors

6 answers

I was under the impression that the mystery was whether or not she was actually smiling.

2007-02-21 05:56:43 · answer #1 · answered by Ivan 2 · 0 0

There is no 'secret'. In the period Mona Lisa and other people were painted, a blinding, Farah Fawcett smile would not have been easily maintained for the long hours and days it would take to paint a portrait. Also, it would not have met the standards of chastity of those days. However, Da Vinci would want to bring out the best in his subject and a slight smile would have been ideal and consistent with his model's very pleasant features. Da Vinci, being the intelligent man he was, probably did expect the smile to draw questions and speculations and add to the intrigue, make people stare and think and worm its way into the collective psyche long enough to become an archtype, the mystery of woman, so to speak. And it did and has become a classic which preserves common themes of humankind with the strength of the ages.

2007-02-21 06:25:00 · answer #2 · answered by WAYNE J 1 · 0 0

Mona Lisa's smile has persistently been a undertaking of many - many times ridiculous - interpretations. Sigmund Freud interpreted the 'smile' as signifying Leonardo's ****** charm to his costly mom;[15] others have defined it as the two harmless and alluring. Many researchers have tried to describe why the smile is seen so in a diverse way via people. the reasons variety from scientific theories approximately human creative and prescient to curious supposition approximately Mona Lisa's identity and emotions. Professor Margaret Livingstone of Harvard college has argued that the smile is in many circumstances drawn in low spatial frequencies, and so can acceptable be seen from a distance or with one's peripheral creative and prescient[sixteen]. for that reason, case in point, the smile looks greater unbelievable whilst observing the portrait's eyes than whilst observing the mouth itself. Christopher Tyler and Leonid Kontsevich of the Smith-Kettlewell Institute in San Francisco believe that the changing nature of the smile is led to via variable ranges of random noise in human seen device.[17] Dina Goldin, Adjunct Professor at Brown college, has argued that the key's interior the dynamic place of Mona Lisa's facial muscle tissues, the place our recommendations's eye unconsciously extends her smile; the effect is an unusual dynamicity to the face that invokes diffused yet good emotions interior the viewer of the portray.[18] In late 2005, Dutch researchers from the college of Amsterdam ran the portray's image via an "emotion acceptance" pc application developed in collaboration with the college of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.[17] The application got here upon the smile to be 80 3% satisfied, 9% disgusted, 6% nervous, 2% indignant, below a million% independent, and not greatly surprised in any respect. particularly than being a radical diagnosis, the test became into greater of an illustration of the recent technologies. The faces of ten women people of Mediterranean ancestry have been used to create a composite image of a independent expression. Researchers then in comparison the composite image to the face interior the portray. They used a grid to break the smile into small divisions, then checked it for each of six emotions: happiness, ask your self, anger, disgust, concern, and sadness.

2016-10-02 12:21:27 · answer #3 · answered by poehlein 3 · 0 0

She was with Child.

2007-02-21 05:57:03 · answer #4 · answered by Lindsay Jane 6 · 0 0

She pooted.

2007-02-21 06:02:40 · answer #5 · answered by zhadowlord 3 · 0 0

She was horny

2007-02-21 05:54:16 · answer #6 · answered by mrnaturl1 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers