A right-wing example of why she and her ilk is not,CANNOT be taken seriously, she said she wished the 9-11 World Trade Center attacks were on the New York Times, a "liberal" newspaper, The Paper Of Record, that has exposed numerous frauds,coverups and misteps by the Bush Administration.
And Ann Coulter wished they were bombed. Why?
Coulter represents the true mindset of many American Conseravtive elitists, do anything to hide facts,bomb even.
And I understand this woman calls herself a "christian"?
What kind of christian, the ones who made Abu Ghraib prisoners praise jesus at gunpoint?
2007-02-21 05:40:14 · 16 answers · asked by Cut The Crap 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yea right. Thanks for the yuks. Come back and play again soon.
2007-02-21 05:43:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Ann Coulter's declare to popularity is her poisonous vitriol. The extra poisonous, the further interest she receives. i imagine that she is largely a nasty individual, bitter, indignant and satisfied to make money from those conservatives who eat her nastiness up with a spoon. they have made her wealthy so she can not renounce being a poisonous harpy each and anytime quickly. EDIT: she is going to be on Hardball for an interview with Chris Matthews this nighttime. He would not like b.s. a lot, it would favor to be thrilling.
2016-12-04 11:27:04 · answer #2 · answered by binford 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's the latest craze the mysterious death of someone who just happened to be an inconvenient truth or was in the way for someone else's motives. TheBCCI scandal-16 'mysterious deaths of investigators.
2007-02-21 06:03:40 · answer #3 · answered by truthorcon 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Ann Coulter is insane.
2007-02-21 05:49:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Mr. Coulter's Adam's Apple puts too much strain on his brain.
2007-02-21 05:46:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
She gives self respecting conservatives and Christians a bad name.
Speaking of giving Conservatives a bad name, I see Jessica has made another moronic comment
2007-02-21 05:46:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
The New York times is often critical of the radical religious Republican right. Rather than answer tough questions many would just eliminate the askers of those questions. Kind of like Hitler did and Stalin did in their times.
2007-02-21 05:44:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Are you referring to the paper of plagarism, shotty/slanted reporting,fabrication...that hellacious rag?
2007-02-22 03:06:22 · answer #8 · answered by revjohnfmcfuddpucker 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because she is a bigot and a total nut.....
It astonishes me that loon is given any semblance of credibility....
In her ideal world there would be a concentration camp in every town.....
2007-02-21 05:55:13 · answer #9 · answered by OctopusGuy 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
WRONG EVENT. IT WAS THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING.
BESIDES WHY ATTACK THE TIMES? IT'S ONLY GOOD FOR TRAINING A PUPPY, LINING A BIRD CAGE, OR FINDING A JOB.
THE PAPER OF RECORD AS YOU CALL IT IS A DISGRACE & HAS COMMITTED ACTS BORDERING ON TREASON.
2007-02-21 06:04:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
THE SAME REASON WHY...
Human beings don't mind if the Bloods and Cripps murder each other. It's just less, violent, anti-American Liberals around.
2007-02-21 05:45:17 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋