I was given relative plcmnt of a child through child protective services. The mother does not support the child in any way & won't even keep the visitation schedule. During mediation she was told that because she did not complete her CPS serv and req that reunification wasn't an option; when told they wanted my family to have legal guardianship, she balked and said that was not what she wanted and wanted her own child back (mind you she has not cooperated at all with anything CPS has asked of her). CPS extended her case for an add'l 6 months and finally CPS got tired of her "bare minimums & excuses" and moved toward termination of her rights. A few weeks before court she called and said "I know I can't take care of my baby but I want my rights" and CPS has backed off of termination. Whave not rcvd any aid at all from CPS/state or the mother & the mother hasn't seen the baby in over 3 months. Why does the birth mother still have a say? What happened to the best interest of the child?
2007-02-21
05:29:02
·
4 answers
·
asked by
HookemPanthers
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
I am not a foster parent. I am a relative with my own children who was given the child so that the child would not be placed in the system, I was the next to the last person they homestudied and the only one they deemed s acceptable. I held every hope that the mother would get it together because at first it had been a struggle financially for me to raise a small child I hadn't anticipated; it's been over a year in and out of court every other month- it's just gotten to be ridiculous how much they let her get away with.
2007-02-21
05:53:57 ·
update #1