Democrats or Republicans or Neo cons who either somehow got special treatment so that they wouldn't be drafted for combat in Vietnam war &/or have no combat experience whatsoever?
Should any of them be allowed to decide the fates of US troops in Iraq? Why not only allow Democrats & Republicans (in DC) who have actually served in COMBAT, decide what should be done w/ US troops in Iraq?
If you disagree please tell me who would be more qualified? Bush the former Yale Cheerleader who had his daddy keep him from serving in combat in Vietnam?
2007-02-21 05:10:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
let dems and repubs in washington with kids fighting in the war decide. oh yeah there aren't any...
2007-02-21 05:19:27 · answer #1 · answered by Tacyella 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it fairly is not precisely hypocrisy - it fairly is Massachusetts politics. Be that because it ought to the 1st swap replaced right into a crass political maneuver to maintain Romney from appointing a republican to serve. The extra moderen concern isn't approximately that, yet approximately dropping a balloting seat for too long (and with it a degraded Democratic majority). the majority concern isn't that extensive a deal - from a numbers game Democrats have a Filibuster evidence majority, yet in functional words they do no longer. they are going to under no circumstances get 60 senators to kill a filibuster on something that has a real debate. the only way you will see this senate block a filibuster on strictly social gathering lines is that if the Republicans engineer opposition to some thing non arguable and considerable and the democrats might desire to apply their super majority to bypass it. Why might Republicans try this? For no different reason than to rigidity the Democrats to apply their power and make it look like they are working roughshod over Republicans. Then use that as political hay to take lower back some seats in the subsequent election.
2016-10-16 04:31:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see no difference between republicans and democrats. They're both vvhores for big money and will never, ever represent the people properly. Let's just face that fact squarely and think of ways to drag these corrupt goons back to earth.
2007-02-21 05:17:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Did you serve? Most Americans do not serve, that doesn't make them cowards. By the way most presidents have not been veterans.
2007-02-21 05:14:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Democrats - the majority are cowards in the face of the enemy and a disgrace.
2007-02-21 05:21:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it sucks that most of our politicians have not served. I think that active duty military service should be a prerequisite for public office.
2007-02-21 05:19:15 · answer #6 · answered by higg1966 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
George W. Bush and all his little neocons, Rice, Cheney, Wolfkowitz, and a host of other non-thinkers
2007-02-21 05:15:00 · answer #7 · answered by rare2findd 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They aren't cowards.
Democrats just want to be your mommy, republicans want to be your daddy, and neocons want to be your lord and savior.
2007-02-21 05:18:19 · answer #8 · answered by mamasquirrel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ho-Hum Harry and Little Nancy, hands down.
Any more "questions", you moron?
2007-02-21 05:15:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Chickenhawks all.
2007-02-21 05:22:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋