who cares TNA sucks!!!!!!!!!
2007-02-21 07:38:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
People can say Bound for Glory, and they'd be right for the most part, but TNA puts equal hype into every pay per view they have, and usually they deliver. I'm not saying it's rare to see a bad match at a TNA PPV, hell, WWE booked Boogey Man v. Booker T at mania last year, and Boogey won! Don't get me started on Starrcade 95 I think it was...it was a terrible card that had Paul Levesq jobbing to Alex Wright! Anyway, TNA's overall PPV outlook is usually positive. Even if they have one or two bad matches, they always have a reason for them being on the card.
2007-02-21 13:19:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Candle 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I THINK it was bound for glory last year there was a bunch of talk in that match like Kurt being the special enforcer for Sting vs Jeff Jarett. and i think it was fallen angel an ajstyles vs lax for the world tag titles i think
2007-02-21 13:19:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
tna : bound for glory
wcw : starcade
wwe/wwf:wrestlemania
2007-02-21 13:14:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dream Match !!! 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
tna has bound for glory as their big ppv
2007-02-21 13:13:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Slammiversary I believe.
2007-02-21 15:19:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Joe 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What is Bound for Glory!!!
2007-02-21 13:14:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jay B 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
bound for glory
2007-02-21 13:17:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Steppenwolfer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe it's Slammeversiry.
2007-02-21 13:13:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by MisterMoney9 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
hahaha "paper view"
2007-02-21 13:44:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Hafeman 5000 4
·
0⤊
1⤋