two in a bush sounds painful
2007-02-21 05:14:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
(a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush)
an old saying, if you already have one in the hand and
you let it go then you will end up with none,because you
won`t get the one`s in the bush.
aplies to anything really
2007-02-21 13:21:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by JACKO 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Two hands in a bush is far better than one.
2007-02-21 13:13:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by First Ascent 4 Thistle 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You only need one hand, unless you got a massive bush.
2007-02-21 15:20:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not if you're smart enough to catch the two in the bush!
2007-02-21 13:14:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Nana of Nana's 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends - has the bush been neatly trimmed?
2007-02-21 13:15:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
How thick is the bush?
2007-02-21 13:15:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Johnny Walker 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
it would depend on what was on the bush
2007-02-21 14:20:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by dottydog 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
always.. give me the three points not the games in hand
2007-02-21 13:13:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by lion of judah 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ive never understood that saying, but I will say yes
2007-02-21 13:13:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋