Has anyone heard how many military s there were between 1993 and 1996? In the first four years of the Clinton Presidency there were 4,417 s in the military. Why has this never been shown as a point of comparrison by the anti war media?
2007-02-21 04:33:58 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
making that point has nothing to do with making President Bush look bad, so the main stream media has no interest in reporting it.
2007-02-21 04:40:32 · answer #1 · answered by webbrew 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
the growth in Saddam's military personell is pretty irrelevant...
obviously after a gulf war they are going to rebuild their military personell ... if not Iran would invade them...
What's important that the media loves to hush up is what the Iraq Study Groups FINDINGS (not personal opinions some have given in interviews..) prove...
Iraq Study Group's Key Findings (Summaritive Report):
http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/CIA/isg-Comp_Report_Key_Findings.pdf
Iraq Study Group : Volume 1
http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/us/c...
** Key Chapters :--
- Key Findings pg.4
- procurement suppliers in the transition and miscalculation phases, 1998 to 2003 pg.116
- Deceptive Trade Practices Supporting Illicit Procurement pg.133
- The procurement of Conventional military goods in breach of UN sanctions pg.267
A Special Interview with I.A.E.A. Inspectors
( the failures of the IAEA/UNMOVIC )
http://www.iraqwatch.org/wmd/iraqibomb.html
A 1993 Report Specifying Undestroyed Missing Items After Operation Desert Storm :
http://www.iraqwatch.org/suppliers/update.htm
2007-02-21 12:50:31 · answer #2 · answered by Corey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what is a military "s"??
Follow up... why the thumbs down because I didn't understand the question?
As for Military DEATHS, I think you will find that number of deaths in the military has remained pretty constant in non wartime training. That number isn't much more or less than when I was in under Reagan and Bush Sr.
2007-02-21 12:37:07 · answer #3 · answered by Amer-I-Can 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think you forgot to post the word 'deaths' . I don't know why it's been hushed-up, but I'm sure it has to do with the overall Presidency of Bill Clinton .
2007-02-21 12:38:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't fit into the anti Bush agenda of the liberal media!
2007-02-21 12:47:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋