big words?????

Question

Hi..can anyone give me an example of an article ( about 200 words) that uses really difficult vocabulary even for people in the English- speaking world. 10 points up for grab!!!
Thanxxx!!!

Answer 1

http://www.doctorslounge.com/cardiology/articles/ischemic_heart/l-arginine_harm/index.htm


medical articles are always troublesome for most people.

Answer 2

Much technical vocabulary is almost impossible to understand:


A high affinity binding site for HP1 can be produced by silencing Lys9 of histone H3 by methylation with

mammalian histone lysine methyltransferase, a suppressor of variegation 39H1 (SUV39H1). MeCP2 can be immunoprecipitated with antibodies prepared against endogenous SUV39H1; on the other hand, immunoprecipitation of SUB39H1 resulted from aHA antibodies to HA-tagged MeCP2. ²

Answer 3

From the Environmental Protection Agency
Re: Drinking Water Contaminants

EPA reviewed ICP-MS methods published by EPA, ASTM International, and the Standard Methods Committee. In each of these methods, sample material in solution is introduced by pneumatic nebulization into a radiofrequency plasma where energy transfer processes cause desolvation, atomization and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma through a differentially pumped vacuum interface and separated on the basis of their mass-to-charge ratio by a quadrupole mass spectrometer having a minimum resolution capability of one atomic mass unit peak width at five percent peak height. The ions transmitted through the quadrupole are detected by an electron multiplier or Faraday detector and the ion information processed by a data handling system.
The sensitivity of each ICP-MS method for compliance
determinations of uranium in drinking water is acceptable and is
sensitive enough to detect at less than one part per billion
(1 ug/L). The uranium MCL is 30 ug/L.
EPA reviewed each of these methods for performance and
applicability to compliance determinations of uranium in drinking
water. Three of these methods, EPA 200.8, ASTM D5673-03 and SM 3125, have acceptable performance and are otherwise suitable for compliance determinations of uranium in drinking water. Method EPA 200.8 was published by EPA in 1994; method ASTM D5673-03 was published by ASTM
International in 2003; and SM 3125 was published by the Standard Methods Committee in 1998. In today's action, EPA is approving the use of these ICP-MS methods for compliance determinations of uranium in drinking water. EPA is taking this action in response to stakeholder requests.
EPA is not, in today's action, approving the use of these methods
for any other purposes. EPA notes that EPA 200.8 was approved for compliance determinations of several regulated metals in drinking water on December 5, 1994. (59 FR 62456) EPA also recognizes that the other two ICP-MS methods approved through today's action for determination of uranium may also be applicable to monitoring for other drinking water contaminants. Although the analytical scope of ASTM D5673-03 and SM
3125 extends beyond uranium, these two methods were not published until 2003 and 1998, respectively. In a later rulemaking, EPA may consider extending the use of ASTM D5673-03 and SM 3125 to compliance determinations of regulated metals.
Like flourometric and laser phosphorimetry methods, ICP-MS measures uranium mass only; therefore all caveats discussed in the December 2000 Radionuclides Rule on using mass methods to determine contributions to gross alpha also apply (65 FR 76724).Today's direct final rule does not effect approval of the 15
methods currently specified at 40 CFR 141.25(a) for compliance
determinations of uranium.

Answer 4

Any Shakespearean play fits that category check em out and see.