A. Liberal Democract whos only wish is to represent to the best of his ability.
B. Typical politian who does what he pleases until election time then makes Big Promisses.
C. Will strech any fact to fit his agenda.
D. Bribe taking crook
E. Daized and confussed.
2007-02-21 02:50:06 · 13 answers · asked by Mother 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
What is a "bribe taking crook", alex?...... Now, I'll go with potent potables for 100 please.
2007-02-21 03:36:26 · answer #1 · answered by merlins_new_apprentice 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
None of the above. Anyone who wants the TRUTH should look Murtha up on Wikipedia. Murtha is described as being pro-life and pro Second Amendment, so he's not all that liberal.
A lot of veterans are both pro-life and pro 2nd.
2007-02-21 03:03:05 · answer #2 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
None of the above
The closest one you have there is A and part of it is incorrect in describing Rep Murtha
He is a military hawk which is not considered liberal and had a 53% rating from the Christian Coalition. That definitely does not make him a liberal
He believes in supporting the troops by getting them out of harms way and not referee a civil war.
He believes in redeployment outside of Iraq and if there is an escalation, moving back in and squashing it, then getting out and leaving the Iraqis to take care of themselves. We are not the "world" police.
He believes that our soldiers should be getting better care from the administration, unlike the so called " conservative" republicans who claim they support the troops but consistently vote to cut funding for veterans.
The Republican controlled House of Representatives had voted in the 2004 budget to cut funding for veteran's health care and benefit programs by nearly $25 billion over the next ten years. It narrowly passed by a vote of 215 to 212, and came just a day after Congress passed a resolution to "Support Our Troops." How exactly did this vote support our troops? Did leaving our current and future veterans veterans without access to health care and compensation qualify as supporting them?
John Murtha visits the troops at Walter Reed every week unlike the cowards who only believe in sacrificing other peoples children and not putting their life on the line for this country. None of the Bush cabal fought for this country. They came up with every excuse in the book. They only show up for photo ops.
Our wounded soldiers should not be housed in a place where mouse dropping and mice, dead cockroaches, mold and mildew, rotting carpet is the norm not the exception.
Yet he is the one that is maligned. He had visited Iraq more than any of the other wretches who claim they support the troops and saw first hand what was going on. For over 18 months he had been saying what was going wrong and that it needed to be fixed and he was decried and called names. Now it is coming to light that he was right.
The President has already planned on cutting funding for veterans yet again in his 2009 budget. This is in an attempt to come up with his "magic" numbers that is supposed to cut his horrendous debt that he has run up. This alone is despicable. Yet he supports the troops.
John Murtha has raised hell about the fact that the surge is sending troops into a battle zone with hardly any equipment much less body armor, yet the President and his cabal support the troops.
You all should be raising hell about the fact that parents have to be holding drives to collect money to buy body armor for their kids. Our soliders are having to use scrap metal to reinforce their armor-less vehicles. Halliburton and its subsidiaries were charging our soldiers $45 for a case of Pepsi, double billing for meals, provided contaminated water to our soldiers, where is the outrage for that? My bad, that is supporting the troops.
2007-02-21 04:31:26 · answer #3 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
right here lies a guy who outfitted an exceptionally costly airport that no person used, it replaced into very nearly for his use completely. He shall no longer be dropping funds. might he relax in peace and can the reliable human beings of PA choose a guy or woman with economic accountability.
2016-10-16 04:18:36 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
F. A poor sole who (in my opinion) was mentally effected during his service to our country. He should be receiving help, not a seat in Congress.
2007-02-21 02:57:56 · answer #5 · answered by heThatDoesNotWantToBeNamed 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
A
but choices B thru E describes your typical Republican
2007-02-21 02:57:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
He is a great example of a corrupt politician.
2007-02-21 02:52:37 · answer #7 · answered by Robert S 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
he is an idiot, plain and simple, he is a disgrace to this nation, as are most liberals.
2007-02-21 02:53:31 · answer #8 · answered by 007 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
F. All of the above.
2007-02-21 03:10:56 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
c
2007-02-21 03:13:39 · answer #10 · answered by Faith White 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋