What a disappointment!
2007-02-21 01:36:27 · 17 answers · asked by Blue Sapphire 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
The issue I have with her is not because of her being an amputee. In fact, my father was a double amputee, due to World War II wounds, and he was able to work and function, even though he wore 2 prosthetic legs. She could be such a wonderful role model, but I have lost respect for Heather because of her behavior and believe, as some answerers mentioned, she's a gold digger.
2007-02-21 03:21:06 · update #1
I agree with the person who hopes the show's legal staff had her sign waivers. I believe she is a gold digger, too. Anyway, she may do well on the show because she'll probably get sympathy votes.
2007-02-21 03:10:53 · answer #1 · answered by Jackie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
thank you on your opinion Leslie, this is intense-high quality to work out that there nevertheless some human beings available that make up their very own techniques incredibly of the media making it up for them. Heather started her profession as a kind till she lost her leg as an harmless sufferer of an twist of destiny with a police motorcycle, she then started artwork on diverse charities for the earnings of disabled human beings, she has worked for those motives ever on the grounds that and unlike many different so observed as stars it replaced into extra often than not refrained from the prevalent public understanding. Being in this application shows what could be finished after this manner of setback in existence, this is by potential of no potential performed for the money, all of us comprehend that she would be very rich after her divorce, as is each ex spouse of a multi millionaire after the divorce, no longer something is declared approximately them being gold diggers. Heather as quickly as took a youthful female drug addict into her very own residence for 6 months and controlled to tutor that ladies existence around, did the papers checklist this? no of direction no longer, they only positioned into their papers issues that make her look undesirable, call her an ex porn movie star even nonetheless that replaced into an academic video and not specific , they have titled her lady Mucca additionally to tarnish her call. Will others reserve judgment and supply her a huge gamble. Chris.
2016-10-16 04:13:24 · answer #2 · answered by cutburth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree that it is a disappointment because she will probably win "sympathy votes," as someone else said. I give her credit for trying this...I don't think I could do it. But, I don't respect her either because of her past behavior. I will definitely be channel surfing or catching up on housework during her segments.
2007-02-21 03:35:38 · answer #3 · answered by Lou 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm disappointed, too, because I usually enjoyed watching that show. I hope the Show's lawyers had her sign a lot of waivers, because, gold digger that she is, she will probably try to sue them for some reason or other.
2007-02-21 03:00:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
This woman has destroyed poor Paul Mc Cartney. Instead of embarrassing him even more why does'nt she disappear?
2007-02-21 01:39:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
I did not know this, Who else will be on Dancing with the Stars?
2007-02-21 01:51:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I was very surprised! It will be very interesting to see how she does on the harder dances. Even though I'm not a fan of her's, I'm interested in seeing how she does, with her leg! Stay tuned!
2007-02-21 02:24:50 · answer #7 · answered by quinner_64 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Shouldn't someone be a star to be on that show?? I mean come on she married an ex-Beatle! So that makes her someone to watch?? I DON'T THINK SO!!
2007-02-21 01:42:51 · answer #8 · answered by Peachy Keen 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Don't you mean "Hopping with the stars"? I kidd people, relax.
2007-02-21 01:39:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I so agree, what happened to her being so sad that her and Paul aren't together!
2007-02-21 01:40:14 · answer #10 · answered by Celeste P 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋