Should Bill Clinton and Al Gore be tried for war crimes?

Question

Should Bill and Al be tried for war crimes, since they attacked/invaded:

Iraq.Serbia,Haiti,Sudan,Kosavo and Afghanistan

All without either Congressional or UN approval.

Isn't that a war crime ??????

Answer 1

Of course they should, they murdered over 10,000 innocent Serbians, including thousands of babies.

They blew up East Africa's only pharmacutical plant, resulting in millions of Africans dying from lack of medicine.

Just so their buddies in the US pharmacutical industry could make millions.

They invaded and removed the Soverign President of the Soverign nation of Haiti.

They attacked Afghanistan to try and force them into signing away their rights to the Clinton buddies Unical.

They attacked countries on more continents than Hitler did !!!!!!

Answer 2

Now, hold on there. There is no need to use falsehoods like our leftist brethren do.

Iraq was under the UN Resolutions and the CeaseFire agreement - where any means necessary to force cooperation by Iraq was allowed. This provision which gave Clinton the authority to bomb Iraq in 1998 is the same provision, in a later resolution, that gave Bush authority to invade Iraq.

Clinton's unprovoked and unwarranted attack on Serbia regarding Kosovo, while it had no UN support, it did have the authorization by Congress. This makes it legal. It doesn't make it right, especially the bombing campaign against Serb civilian targets from high altitude (read: high levels of collateral damage), but it was legal.

This whole "war crimes" hysteria over minor things is a spit in the eye to true war crimes victims.

Answer 3

Now, carry on there. there is not any might desire to apply falsehoods like our leftist brethren do. Iraq replaced into under the UN Resolutions and the CeaseFire contract - the place any potential had to rigidity cooperation by potential of Iraq replaced into allowed. This provision which gave Clinton the authority to bomb Iraq in 1998 is a similar provision, in a later determination, that gave Bush authority to invade Iraq. Clinton's unprovoked and unwarranted attack on Serbia relating to Kosovo, on a similar time because it had no UN help, it did have the authorization by potential of Congress. This makes it criminal. It does not make it suitable, incredibly the bombing marketing campaign against Serb civilian objectives from intense altitude (examine: intense stages of collateral injury), despite the fact that it replaced into criminal. this entire "conflict crimes" hysteria over minor issues is a spit in the attention to actual conflict crimes victims.

Answer 4

Yes of being the same as Bush. There is not any difference.
There is some speech about difference of republicans and democrats, and you get the point right: where is the difference in foreign affairs? There isn't any, they were using the same methods as Bush now. Bush of course came much more far but I would like to see Clinton in this situation with Iraq. Clinton = Bush, it's the same.

Answer 5

Sandy
Please do not stoop down to their level. No US leaders should be tried for war crimes. The US has been and is being attacked.

"I believe that we lost critical time in dealing with Iran because the White House chose to downplay the threats. I don't believe you face threats like Iran by standing on the sidelines. Let's be clear about the threat we face now: A nuclear Iran is a danger. The regime's pro-terrorist, and anti-American and its rhetoric only underscores the urgency of the threat it poses. Our policy must be clear and unequivocal. We cannot and should not – must not –permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons. In order to prevent that from occurring, we must have more support vigorously and publicly expressed by China and Russia, and we must move as quickly as feasible for action in the United Nations. We cannot take any option off the table in sending a clear message to the current leadership of Iran – that they will not be permitted to acquire nuclear weapons."
Winston Churchill

Answer 6

They should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize as model humanitarians. Unlike George Bush Sr. who stood by and did nothing as Serbs butchered the the population of Bosnia and neighboring republics.

Answer 7

No, that's not a war crime. A war crime would be torture, or use of banned weapons.

Answer 8

Absolutely no !!!!! If they were (which they will not), perhaps Chenney and George Bush would roll out the welcome mat for them, because they would be there first!!!

Answer 9

No, but Bush Jr. and Cheney should be!!!