English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and the troops
and voters
and congress
except chenney and dumbfield
TREASON by bush

2007-02-21 01:24:21 · 9 answers · asked by DumbsField o 1 in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

Treason? Come on get a new line! NO TREASON was committed!

2007-02-21 01:31:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

you comprehend its no longer even unavoidably that the WMD info became incorrect. For all all of us comprehend it really is buried ina secret area or overseas like syria. Satelitte suggestion printed that the places the UN became going to study would have a intense quantity of site visitors jointly with great freight vehicles leaving the centers the day earlier guns inspectors would excursion the area. it really is particularly conceivable that those vehicles housed WMD's that Saddam didnt pick seized or destroyed. Given the mobility if his project, it really is particularly conceivable they're in yet another area at present waiting for use adverse to both human beings interior the area, the US, or Europe. The community authorities failed Lousiana, no longer Bush. You dont see Mississippi having issues evacuating or rebuilding do you?

2016-12-04 11:12:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Democrats who voted in favor of the war did so, because Bush was riding a wave of popularity at the time and they didn't want to make themselves look bad by opposing him.

2007-02-21 01:29:36 · answer #3 · answered by tangerine 7 · 3 1

She probably got the same information that Bush got.

She would have to rely on the same sources. Although it may have been wrong, she can not be blamed for this.

2007-02-21 01:35:10 · answer #4 · answered by Randy P 3 · 0 1

We keep forgetting that while WMD was always A problem, it was not the sole reason for going to Iraq.

2007-02-21 01:29:29 · answer #5 · answered by Curt 4 · 1 1

Do you think he would have invaded if Iraq DID have WMD?

2007-02-21 01:28:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Nope.

2007-02-21 01:26:52 · answer #7 · answered by Gottlos 4 · 0 0

Another lib, for the war before they were against it.

2007-02-21 01:43:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

give it up! Your President is not guilty...................

2007-02-21 01:27:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers