Did Bush give Blair permission to pull Britains troops out of Iraq?

Question

After all Blair is Bushs lap dog. Tony best clear this with his owner before he commits to it.

Answer 1

Why should Blair need his permission?

Answer 2

Could it possibly be that the British were successful in training Iraqi troops to take over?

They have been slowly turning over regions to Iraqi troops over the past year.

There are 18 provinces in Iraq.

15 out of the 18 Provinces are fairly stable.

Baghdad is where the major unrest is at. Otherwise you'd here more reports about British troops dying.

They've actually done their job. No one is really looking at the country as a whole. Because all you hear about are Baghdad bombings.

You never hear about the 180,000 Iraqi troops already being trained. You never hear about the 4500 schools rebuilt. You never hear about the 35,000 new jobs created.

You never hear about Iraqi's having races like NASCAR out in the desert.

How do I know? I get reports directly from Iraq, as reported by Iraqi reporters for Iraqi media. The message is mixed. It is not all good, and not all bad, and depends on the region.

Example: Just because New Orleans has a high rate of violent crime, does not mean the entire US is like that. Same thing with Iraq. The Kurdish area is fairly stable and businesses there are booming.

Answer 3

that is the best question I have read on here today. Put a smile on my face. Was just wondering if Blair knows he said this or whether they drugged him first???!!!!

And to answer Redstapler nowhere is safe in Iraq at the moment. I talk to my inlaws daily and have quite often ben cut off due to fighting etc. The point is they dont want the British or the Americans there.
Perhaps you should talk to some Iraqis first!!!!!!

Answer 4

maybe britains showing its hightime they stop being the *****, hike up their big girl panties, and bring their troops home. Britain's got no reason to be over in Iraq. Hell, we dont have a reason beyond the fact that the country would implode in so many different ways. I wouldn't be surprised if other countries start following suit.

Answer 5

it fairly is heavily one-sided thinking. think of this place from Blair's attitude. He sees united statesa. actually ripping itself into shreds in simple terms attempting to establish no count if or to no longer deliver in extra troops. you notice human beings die each and on a daily basis. in spite of if it fairly is an American or British, it fairly is nevertheless a existence! Blair additionally sees the protests from very nearly each and each united states. there's a lot of surveys performed on the Iraq conflict, in simple terms slightly extra beneficial than 0.5 consents with Bush's theory. Invading Iraq has been a mistake. think of approximately it. what's the reason to invade Iraq. it fairly is Bush's clarification: To seize the chief of Al Qaeda who's hiding in Iraq, we ought to invade Iraq. you will possibly be dissatisfied that your relative has been KIA, yet do you comprehend what proportion Iraq civilain deaths there have been? for style of each and each NATO soldier killed, approximately thousands of civilians have died. how are you able to justify this destruction? You blame the militants. If Iraq have been to invade united statesa., might you combat on your death to guard united statesa.? lower back to Blair, he feels the rigidity, he doubts Bush's coverage, human beings in Britain is very nearly yelling at him to convey their sons lower back from wars that they had no relation of. actual, Blair is Bush's best chum. actual lower back, as an best chum he ought to help. yet could no longer Blair help in different methods? supply nutrition? supply ammo? you are able to't justify bringing different international locations right into a conflict which you started. Al Qaeda bombed the international commerce centre. this is incredibly evil. You took revenge and killed a lot extra and have a lot casualties. How do you justify that?

Answer 6

tony blair is more scared of the queen, then he is of george bush.