2007-02-21 00:56:29 · 19 answers · asked by Simon W 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Because B Liar and George Bush are trying to fool the public by making untrue statements that Iran is an enemy of the west obviously they have their own hidden agenda.
Hopefully the people of America and Britain will not stand for an Invasion of Iran, and if they do God help us all.
2007-02-21 01:06:48 · answer #1 · answered by st.abbs 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Because neither Britain, India, Pakistan, or Israel have threatened to use them against the United States. If Iran gets them, we know they're coming for us because they want Israel off the map and we support Israel. They also shout "death to America" at public executions, dead giveaway there....so America doesn't want them to have them. The U.N. agrees because most countries (besides the Islamifascist ones) agree that is the U.S. gets nuked it'll be bad for everyone (economy, aid, etc) so everyone voted for sanctions on Iran.
2007-02-23 14:14:42 · answer #2 · answered by LadySuri 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the leaders of Britain, USA, India, Pakistan + Israel are responsible enough to only authorise them being used as an absolute last resort......... while since the revolution Iran has been lead by people who are about as mentally stable as a glue sniffing Rottweiler suffering from Heroin withdrawal & has it's testicles caught in a mousetrap.
2007-02-21 10:34:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It isn't that they can't. They are showing us that they can. The issue is that they shouldn't. Why make something that isn't going to be used? India didn't need them. Pakistan didn't, nor did Israel. Really, as a citizen of the only nation to have used them on an enemy, I can soundly say that Nukes are a bad idea. Nuclear Energy, however is good. We should try to encourage its development, everywhere. But, when people aren't transparent, especially when making inflammatory remarks about the erasure of nations, that's when you need to sit up, and say, "Whoa! Who the hell do you think you are, making this kind of noise, and expecting us to sit idly by as you build this thing that might be dangerous?"
2007-02-21 01:06:26 · answer #4 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
exciting. before everything, it relies upon on what's accomplished with the weapons of mass destruction. Iran already reported that they are going to annihilate Israel. That Israel has no ideal to exist. that they are going to attack and do away with the zionists as quickly as and for all. Secondly, Iran and Iraq. the place did the pertoleum funds flow? are you able to assert interior the lining of the goverments? It would not pass out to help their people. a good argument in asserting approximately Iraq. it variety of feels that GWB basically had to end what his father had to do. break Iraq. yet another question i could ask you. What of the people who died in those planes, skyscrapers and homes on 9/11? as long as guy lives, there will be wars.
2016-10-02 12:04:32 · answer #5 · answered by dorais 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont mind iran having nukes because they will never use it unlike america
iran knows the consequences the only reason america doesnt want iran to have nukes is if america makes another phony excuse to attack iran they'll be screwed and they will get no oil
a famous sayin "barking dogs seldom bites"
iran is the dog that bark not the one that bites
for iran nuke war with israel is to risky to take
the nukes are for show and propaganda or in other words psychological warfare any such attacks will bring complete isolation even from the closest of allies ie. india china russia and others in mid east and support from some
2007-02-23 10:01:32 · answer #6 · answered by YR1947 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because Iran is not a friend of these countries and so is seen as a possible enemy, plus i do believe that how they make these is against the U.N's Law. I think they have to meet several targets of humanity and stableship, i think! Crackers aint it, who wants them anyway, if we need to go to war, lets use less destructive forces, cause someone said, i don't know how WW3 will be fought, but WW4 will be sticks and stones
2007-02-21 01:01:05 · answer #7 · answered by Blackie 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Those of us that have them can be trusted to not fire them without a very good reason, in fact we are not likely to ever fire them for any reason.
Iran is a 'rogue' state and it is entirely possible that if they had the capability they would launch one at someone for something fairly insignificant.
They can't even be straight up about their nuclear program, so imagine the tension there would be if they actually had the weapons?
2007-02-21 01:03:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
generally speaking.. Iran has already said they would use them...
Iseral has had them for decades and has never come close to using them... which is amazing considering the number of times they have been bombed or attacked...
pakistan I think would have used them but india also has them so they hold back....
in general I dont think any group bent on killing another group should be allowed power any place on the earth.. the present president of Iran has said at least 20 times.. when he gets a nuke he would use it on iseral / europe / and if he can get it here.. the US...
sooo taking him for his word... he should not be allowed a weopon like that..
the funny part about this is... when we pull out of iraq before we finish.. the terriorist will follow us home.. and attack the US here on our own soil.. like they have done in other nations...we will be so tied up trying to stop them here.. that he ( iran ) will get them anyway., and it will be to late.. we will have to attack him and stop the next global limited nuke war...
if you think about it.. once he has one.. and launches on iseral... iseral will launch... the US will fire everything short of nuke weopons... several other mideast nations will get involved.. the russians will get in the middle of it.. then china.... it would be a bad thing... and for those wackos that think he wouldnt do it.... the president of ( iran ) believes by starting the next big war he can bring his god back to earth faster.. it is part of his religion... and he follows it with a passion
2007-02-21 01:06:59 · answer #9 · answered by Larry M 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The USA tells the world who and who cannot have nuclear weapons, the countries you have named are all allies of USA.
2007-02-21 08:58:02 · answer #10 · answered by cassidy 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋