English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...not to mention every other major Democrat between 1998 and 2003, and beyond?

Watch and weep Libs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNgaVtVaiJE

2007-02-21 00:53:16 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

Because they never thought anyone would actually DO anything but talk.

Bush surprised them with action. When later they supported the troop build up, they figured (incorrectly) that Bush would resist it. When he acted on it, they forgot their earlier support.

The only action liberal Marxists seem capable of is calling you 'uneducated wacko Bush bot' when you try reminding them of history that is not old enough to be rewritten by teachers' union.

That, and try to pass Clinton off as the hero who knocked out all of Saddam's weapons caches while someone's head was buried in his lap.

2007-02-21 01:18:25 · answer #1 · answered by Curt 4 · 1 1

Excuse me, 1998-2003?

You are not exactly being honest here are you?

In 1998, Clinton bombed and successfully destroyed all of Saddam’s WMD manufacturing facilities (over Republican objection, whining, and complaining – just as they did while Clinton successfully dealt with Bosnia). You people just HATE winning wars, don’t you? Why is that?

Oh yeah, I forgot – Bush-bots are poorly educated and uninformed (exactly the same as their hero).

------------------------------------

Curt –

Right, Bush has lost in Afghanistan, lost in Iraq, and is being pounded in the war on terror.

That sure showed them what a man dedicated to buffoonery and failure can do, I guess.
--------------------

That only demonstrates Clinton's ability to multitask.

2007-02-21 01:11:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Way to try and draw attention away from Bush. Regardless of whether he had WMD's or not, they never advocated going to war against him, as they knew it would turn into a mess like it is now. So did Bush Sr for that matter. That's why he didn't chase him into Iraq. If I cry it will be becasue of the damage that Bush has done to our country.

2007-02-21 00:59:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Wow. 1998. That was yesterday.

2007-02-21 01:02:31 · answer #4 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 3 2

STOP AVOIDING THE FACT THAT BUSH IS THE ONE WHO INVADED IRAQ UNDER FALSE PRETENSE.

2007-02-21 03:30:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because they were lied to, like everyone else in the country.

2007-02-21 01:16:41 · answer #6 · answered by mixedup 4 · 1 2

you really need to take your meds, wacko.

2007-02-21 00:58:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers