Losing his grip on power - trying to win back the voters! Simple as that!
2007-02-20 23:59:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by jamand 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Blair is in a no win. There's too many chief and not enough Indians, you get all this Anit Iraq war protesters, all it is is rebellion. You can only take from this that they are Pro Saddam. You have broadshhet readers who think there say is more legitimate that a taabloid readers opinion, and basically what ever tony blair does from now people will slate him because its fashionable! Saddam was a bad man, and people who don't agree with the war can only be Pro Saddam - Fact, cause they din't want rid of him! The WMD was the only subject of the war not proven, and people make the own minds up. i suggest you search for this book and read it - there's a bomb in my garden! - Write by Saddams main scientist how they got french, German and Even AMERICAN help in the pursuit of them and how they set up the centrifuges to produce it! Saddams not thick, they would have cottoned on and moved them totally out the country. you often here little snippets of certain materials critical to WMD being found in old factories. so in a round about way, His motives are listening to the chief wannabe's and he's given the Iraqi's training and equipment, we can't stay there for 50 years!!!
2007-02-21 00:25:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Blackie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Blair, just like any other dictator, want to leave office on a high note - as high as he can get, anyway. He knows, as we all do, that Iraq is a lost cause. Get out while the going is still reasonably good. Try and patch it up a bit and make it look like we achieved something.
What Blair is slowly waking up to is an electorate which is very largely best described as 'conservative' with a small 'c', but which could very easily become one with a very large 'C'.
Either we get a hung parliament at the next election or maybe a very slender Conservative majority of about 2 to 6 seats. You can form a government but it's difficult if someone goes off sick and other parties refuse to send one of their guys off to balance it out. Happens.
2007-02-21 00:38:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
tidying up for the next leader elect,
trying to save a few billion for the british economy
sidestepping out of any potention iran conflict
basically with gold prices marching up i think he's done the right thing,
2007-02-21 19:19:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's thinking........
- Long term i.e. elections. Labour ending this issue so when they do come its not on the agenda.
- Wants out as part of his legacy.
- Knows that it is a total balls-up and wants to distance himself from it.
- Knows that that he is 'flogging a dead horse'.
- Trying to show that he is not a 'yankie Lap-dog'.
2007-02-21 00:43:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by David 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is still looking for his legacy and thinks everyone will forget it was him who put the troops there in the first place.
2007-02-21 06:14:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by norfolk'n good 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Local elections in MAY....All local Councillors are crapping thereselves..
2007-02-21 00:00:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Trevor J 2
·
1⤊
0⤋