On September 21, 1972, Marcos declared Martial Law. This marked the beginning of the Marcos dictatorship. Proclamation 1081 placed the entire country under the military. It was signed on September 21, 1972 and announced to the nation in the evening of September 23, 1972. His main reason for declaring Martial Law as "to save the Republic" and "to reform society". He explained that the growing violence in the nation, caused by the leftists and the rightists elements had come to certain magnitude that required martial law.
It was believed that the true reason why Marcos declared martial was to perpetuate his rule over the Philippines. The 1935 Constitution limited the term of the President to no more than eight consecutive years in office.
The constitution did not say how long martial law should last. The constitution left much about martial law to the President's own judgment.
Marcos extended the period of Martial Law beyond the end of his term in 1973. He abolished the Congress of the Philippines and over its legislative powers. Thus, Marcos became a one-man ruler, a dictator. Marcos described his martial law government as a "constitutional authoritarianism".
Although the courts remained in the judiciary, the judges of all courts, from the Supreme Court down to the lowest courts, became "casuals". Their stay in office depended on the wishes of the dictator.
Under the martial law Marcos disregarded the constitution. For instance, he violated the provision which guaranteed the Bill of Rights (Article III). Upon his orders, the military picked up and detained thousands of Filipinos suspected of subversion. Among them were his critics and political opponents namely Senator Benigno S. Aquino, Jr., Francisco "Soc"Rodrigo, Jose W. Diokno and Jovita R. Salonga. Hundreds of detainees were tortured by their captors. Some disappeared and were never found again. Many were held in military detention camps for years without trial.
As a result of the foregoing measured, the crime rate in the country was reduced significantly. People became law-abiding. But these good gains did not last long. After a year of martial law, crime rates started to soar. By the time Marcos was removed from power, the peace and order situation in the country had become worse.
This communist insurgency problem did not stop when Marcos declared Martial law. A government report in 1986 showed that the NPAs already numbered over 16,000 heavily-armed guerillas. The NPAs waged a vigorous war against government forces They staged ambuscades and engaged in terrorist activities such as assassination of local officials who were known to be engaged in corrupt activities. The NPA killer squads were called Sparrow Units. They were feared in the areas under their control. They also imposed taxed in their territories.
To fight the growing NPA threat, Marcos increased the armed forces to over 200,000 men. He also organized Civilian Home Defense Forces in the rural areas threatened by the NPAs . Several NPA leaders were captured like Jose Ma. Sison, alleged founder of the communist Party in the Philippines; Bernabe Buscayno, the NPA chief, and Victor Corpus, a renegade PC lieutenant.
The rampant violation of human rights of the people in the rural areas suspected of being NPA sympathizers, the injustices committed by some government officials and powerful and influential persons, and the continuing poverty of the people were used as propaganda of the NPA in attracting idealistic young people. Even priests and nuns who were witnesses to the oppression of the Marcos dictatorship join the NPAs. One of the priests who joined the NPA was Father Conrado Balweg of the Society of the Divine Word (SVD). He became a rebel folk hero to the ethnic tribes in the Cordilleras in Northern Luzon. As of July 1993, Balweg claimed to reports: "I am still in charge".
2007-02-21 12:49:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No... This is too controversial question to be asked.....Please don't trust what ever the American block's media and the disinformation they create is true. How can a dictator with stand 60 years in power, if his people don't love him is a question.Saddam Hussein was a dictator...while Musharraf is not. East Timur's fate was decided within few years... but the fate of the Palestinians and Kashmiri's is not on the agenda of the U.nations. The big brother will be hated, by many people and nations, till they deal equally in all the matters.
2007-02-20 21:42:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dr. Azim Ulah 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your dad is definitely a "loyalist", that's what they call his followers. There is no such thing as misjudged by history, misjudged by historians perhaps? But historians are never biased and just write everything that has happened in history. So if history says that Marcos is a dictator, it must be true.
2016-05-24 01:23:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He sure was, of the Philippines, until kicked out by popular consent. By imposing marshal law from 1972 to 1981 he was able to act both as President and Prime minister. After martial law he rigged elections until he fled after the popular people revolution in 1986. his wife Imelda had and impressive collection of shoes, while people in the Philippines starved.
2007-02-20 21:50:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Paul HW 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes of course.
2007-02-20 21:32:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, it is true.
2007-02-20 21:25:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no worse than now ... gloria in excelsis
2007-02-20 21:25:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by q6656303 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, HE WAS.
2007-02-20 21:31:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Olimbia T 1
·
0⤊
0⤋