do you think to have peace in the world ,peaceful solutions are necessary or war?
2007-02-20 20:59:05 · 9 answers · asked by bigbang 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well i think trying make peace using the war is just like trying to extinguish a fire with TNT
2007-02-20 21:05:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If you already have peace, how does 'peace' rise from that? Peace comes from war in the sense that if you and I disagree, go to war, and I kill you, all that's left is peace because our disagreement is gone. The problem is that someone else will come along and another disagreement will arise. While MLK and Gandhi were peaceful, the fights they fought are still going today. I'm not saying violence would have made them more effective, but peace didn't completely solve the problems either.
2016-05-24 01:23:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As asinine as it sounds war is a necessity for peace there are too many crazy opportunists in this world to ever have peace from diplomacy
2007-02-20 21:05:43 · answer #3 · answered by JOHN D 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this all depends on the factions involved. Sometimes wars are inevitable and necessary, such as WW1 and WW2. it is always better to try for a peaceful solution but sometimes this will not work!
2007-02-21 01:50:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like WAR AND PEACE
2007-02-20 21:05:35 · answer #5 · answered by becca 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
War
I would have loved to seen a peaceful solution to Hitler.
2007-02-20 21:06:24 · answer #6 · answered by SGT 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
WAR IS PEACE
Two Georges said that. Orwell and Bush
2007-02-20 21:08:43 · answer #7 · answered by emiliosailez 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's impossible to be diplomatic with a group of people who are willing to fly airplanes into our skyscrapers.
2007-02-20 21:16:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
"Peace" doesn't work so well when the enemy is trying to kill you
2007-02-20 21:05:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋