2007-02-20 16:55:59 · 10 answers · asked by Betty Boop 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
NO!
2007-02-20 16:58:17 · answer #1 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If she wins the Democratic nomination at the convention, then she has a big chance to win the presidency. You need to remember, it is not the president that leads the nation, it is the cabinet members and Congress. With her husband being a former president, I feel that he will be right behind her and coaching her on what to do, and how to run the country. I also feel that 2 heads are better than one. We need someone in there, that has some experience, and Hilary has plenty of that.
For that reason, I will vote for Hilary.
2007-02-20 17:13:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It seems the only credential Hillary Clinton brings to the table is that she is a woman.
A few facts about the woman who would aspire to be Commander in chief of the Armed Forces
She is anti military and her entire background is one of contempt for anyone in the military.
She is condescending even to her Secret Service detail
More,
She and her bubby, Bill, bought a million + dollar mansion in New York so she would qualify for residency in New York in order to run for Senate. she knew the NY was predominantly liberal. Their monthly mortgage is over $10,000 a month. How does one afford that kind of luxury on a Senator's salary? Well, the Clintons qualify for Secret Service protection for life. In order to house the SS detail, they had a guesthouse built. Noble? Wait!
They charge the Secret Service $10,000 a month to rent the guesthouse. So, we - the taxpayer - get to pay for the bulk of the Clintons luxurious life style.
Doesn't that just make you feel warm and fuzzy all over?
postcsript
Bll gets to pocket the $200,000 a year he receives for being an ex-President.
Is reform needed?
Oh Hell Yeah!!!!
2007-02-24 12:11:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
not to any extent further. via being made secretary of state, there is little or no " politicking": she will do to further her occupation. And, in 3 years considered one in each and every of two matters will ensue./ Obama could have accomplished a concepts-blowing pastime and he will coast to a 2d term, or could have accomplished one in each and every of those undesirable pastime that there's no way a Dem, any Dem , could % to win. Then, once you're thinking 2016, it fairly is;s 8 years from now, and hundreds of hundreds of voters who shop in suggestions bill Clinton could have died off, and the Clinton mystique could have long replace right into a topic remember of the previous.
2016-12-17 15:09:37 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really do think so, she is qualified and having a husband that was President is a nice perk. It seems the Republicans are off course. It is still early they may find a direction.
2007-02-20 18:30:06 · answer #5 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is not middle of the road enough to win voters who might vote either Democrat or Republican. I think if the Democratic Party nominates her they will likely lose the next election.
2007-02-20 17:00:20 · answer #6 · answered by Mark A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not,when a Man screws up,like Bush,you need a Woman too fix it,she can..
2007-02-20 17:02:23 · answer #7 · answered by karl s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I want to see her as president and then I like to know will she give or receive in the oval office
2007-02-20 20:16:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is very much possible ,check her genetic bloodline
she apparently belongs to the correct linage
as most of the presidents did.
2007-02-20 16:59:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think not & I pray not.
2007-02-20 17:23:22 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋