What would our Founding Fathers think of detaining people without trials?

Question

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070221/ap_on_go_su_co/detainees_lawsuits

thanks for not answering Leo.....

Now we don't string them up we " persuade " them to cooperate.....

Answer 1

they'd think that is exactly the sort of abuse of power they fought a revolution over.

Answer 2

I know what the author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, would have thought. He would have thought it the most nefarious miscarriage of justice possible. He felt so strongly about the right to dissent and the right to freedom that he and John Adams parted ways for 25 years over the issue as embodied by the provisions of the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 . If Jefferson were alive today he would definitely be in the faces of the cowardly members of Congress who have done nothing to stop this true miscarriage of justice. He would be scolding them as a bunch of lily livered cowards who let an incompetent megalomaniacal president turn around the "innocent until proven guilty" principle and instead make it the "we say you're guilty, and we won't let you prove otherwise" principle. Future historians will judge the days of the Bush Administration to be among the darkest in U.S. history, just as past and present historians have judged the days of the Alien and Sedition Acts.

Answer 3

The founding fathers never addressed how the United States deals with foreigners outside the USA. The Constitution they wrote was designed to protect Americans in America, NOTHING more.
The new Muslim Congressman borrowed Thomas Jefferson's Koran to have with him when he took the oath of office. That is funny because Thomas Jefferson only got that Koran so he could understand the evil of Islam that the USA was faced with!

Answer 4

i did no longer rather watch information in the process the bush era via fact i became in severe college and did no longer rather care yet I definitely have a thought on your question. Bush became demonized heavily for doing quite small issues that way while obama ought to pose via fact the savior. no person might ever suspect that the savior might do some of those poor issues, and to maintain extra suspicion away the MSM would not rather disguise a number of those new regulations that are handed. The republican and democratic party are a 2 party dictator equipment. They use one party to take each and all of the blame and the different party does the grimy artwork. human beings determine "eh he would be in place of work for basically 4 years, the subsequent president could be extra ideal" yet they are incorrect. a number of those applicants are a similar. they are all interior the wallet of particular pastimes.

Answer 5

I am rather certain that they detained plenty of British soldiers during the Revolution without a trial.

Answer 6

George Bush is no George Washington.


“In New York, [George] Washington had wept while watching through a spyglass as the British massacred Americans who had surrendered. But Washington, Fischer writes, ‘often reminded his men that they were an army of liberty and freedom, and that the rights of humanity for which they were fighting should extend even to their enemies.’ To the American officer in charge of 221 prisoners taken at Princeton, Washington said, ‘Treat them with humanity, and let them have no reason to complain of our copying the brutal example of the British army in their treatment of our unfortunate brethren.’ ”

Answer 7

If the detained were US citizens (white male taxpayers - think of the times) detained in the US, they might have some questions.

If they weren't US citizens or in the US then I think they'd dismiss the question.

Answer 8

reflection,

Our founding fathers were considered terrorists by the British in the revolutionary war and I'm sure detained many people without due process in times of war. I think they would understand.

Answer 9

You'll need to go back to WWII for the answer to this one. Remember, we interred many more Japanese-Americans (162,000 - 62% of which were US Citizens) during WWII than prisoners at Gitmo.

From what I understand, they didn't get trials, either.

Answer 10

The Founding Fathers will object to the detention of people without being tried for any crime because it is a violation of the constitutional right to liberty.

Answer 11

John Adams would have - did - try this once, & the Supreme Court shot him down. Aaron Burr killed Alexander Hamilton in a duel & went on to become Vice President. Too bad he isn't around to challenge Bush. Then again, that would leave Chehey in command. Forget I mentioned it.