Hunter or Tancredo- border, no amnesty.
From Indiana
2007-02-20 17:04:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by jason s 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton. I'm from New Jersey. I'll vote for here because she is experienced and seems to know her policies. She voted for the Iraq war but it was a mistake and she hasn't taken a liberal position of immediate withdrawal which I like. She still wants a concrete solution and she is much better than the other Democratic candidates.
2007-02-21 06:42:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by cynical 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
What is this all about, Hillary Clinton - now honestly didn't she act
more like a man than her husband, well with out her balls to rule her thinking.
It is a fact most men are ruled by their *****, and power.
Maybe we need someone who can care for the country first, before fighting over a ego trip of winning a war.
We are already in dept deep enough that their is really no way out unless we do care for our nation, people, land, and strengthen our resources. Why are we off fighting, causing more dept when we have plenty of our own rescources here?
2007-02-20 17:36:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
If I were able to vote,I would vote for Hilary because I
think this country needs a woman president and if she is the only
woman that has guts enough to run than she deserves to win.
Go Hilary!!
From Michigan
2007-02-21 04:20:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Newt or Tancredo would be my choice. Tancredo because he is strong on defense of the border. Newt because one of the most important things to know is history. Like they say if you don't know history you are bound to repeat the mistakes in history. Newt is a history professor.
Also, Newt is a strong Constitutionalist and that is very necessary today when so many politicians want to give everything over to the UN, that worthless place that occupies such valuable real estate in Manhattan.
I am from Florida
I despised Kerry because he could never stick to one story. McCain is just like him. His beliefs are based on the poll of the day.
If you don't stand for something you will fall for anything
2007-02-20 15:16:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kye H 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Oh God..ANYONE but hillary!! Save me from the b****!! She can't *run* a government she can only be a dictator, and her intelligence is a joke, she only knows how to manipulate to get her way and change her opinion daily to match whatever the people want her to be that day. I'm sure she'll do whatever it takes to get herself elected, there's nothing she won't stoop to. No way I'd vote for Obama either, nearly as bad.
My vote will probably go to Giuliani.
-from Kansas
2007-02-20 16:25:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by dancingmel02 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Kucinich
1 He is the only one saying FIX NAFTA, GATT and WTO and not saying, "Irresponsible globalization is here to stay so deal with it."
2. His healthcare plan gets rid of for-profit insurance companies. What does it tell you when the 2nd richest man in the USA gained most of his wealth by owning insurance companies.
2007-02-22 09:52:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Duncan Hunter
2007-02-20 15:19:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by smatthies65 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
The most qualified person for the job.
Honestly- the one that best serves ME.
I'm Texan and never liked this batch of shrubbary.
Loved the old landscape better.
Yet its true, I would have voted Democrate, at that ticket been reversed last time.
I VOTE IN EVERY ELECTION- from small to big. Everyone counts.
2007-02-20 15:08:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Denise W 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
John Edwards!
2007-02-21 04:01:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by pwithers12 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Tom Vilsack - I have been reading about him alot and he was the Iowa Governor. Made alot of positive changes for that state and got it back on track. Also he is very involved in children and their protection.
2007-02-20 22:55:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by bufalo1501 2
·
0⤊
0⤋