English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

three reason why or why not?

2007-02-20 14:10:40 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Zoology

8 answers

no there is a reason why they are extinct it is fate

2007-02-20 14:17:53 · answer #1 · answered by undercovernudist 6 · 0 0

The problem with recreating extinct animals is that we have not 'fixed' the problems that caused their extinction in the first place. Most extinctions have occurred because an animal has been over hunted or its habitat has been destroyed. In most of these countries, those areas have not been reuperated and may never be, and hunting continues to be a problem because the resources (money, food, etc.) are not available and there remain a real shortage of alternatives for the local people. Bringing them back to put them in a zoo exhibit is not the life they deserve.

I say that instead of bringing back the animals that we have already brought to extinction, we should concentrate all of our efforts into preventing future loss. There are many species out there on the verge of extinction that need our help.

2007-02-20 22:41:46 · answer #2 · answered by wolffiegirl 2 · 1 0

How in the world would we do that?! If an animal is extinct, we don't know what its DNA makeup is or how its proteins are arranged. How would we recreate an extinct animal when we have nothing to go on? (Are you sure some of the animals are extinct? By some swamp in Africa, natives have seen dinosaurs. They said "big creatures", but when scientists went there to investigate, they brought pictures of dinosaurs with them, and those natives identified some of those dinosaurs as the creatures they see from time to time. And if nobody's ever seen a dinosaur, how do they know what they look like? There are so many pictures of creatures "no human has ever seen" (supposedly).)

2007-02-20 22:49:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Only one reason is necessary. If they wanted to bring back the wooly mamoths or Tyrannosaurus Rex what animal would be large enough to become impregnated with one? Or better yet where do you think you would live if the dinosaurs were to return. We need to care for the ones that are still here on earth.

2007-02-20 23:36:53 · answer #4 · answered by LucySD 7 · 0 0

I say that we don't, unless we were directly involved with their death, i.e. we bulldozed a bunch of them.

Is it possible your teacher or prof is a mental midget? If a teacher says give me n reasons why blah blah blah, either the number of reasons matches exactly with the number of points made in your textbook, or their pulling numbers out of their tushes. I used to conctradict every aspect of my teacher's leassons and still got great grades. And I REALLY used to hate the 'give me n reasons' stuff.

2007-02-20 22:34:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, 1 our inviroment has changed dramaticaly since their lifetime, the foods they ate back then are no longer about, and it would be too dangerous for humans, and for the animal, cause of, their being vehicles now.

2007-02-24 09:41:24 · answer #6 · answered by debe20062000 2 · 0 0

Yes!
When I was a teenager we ride small bulls in Rodeos. So, three answers are;
(1-3) Ride a something "Wild/Different"!

2007-02-20 22:20:03 · answer #7 · answered by Snaglefritz 7 · 0 0

Yes, we should recreate the ever popular canineasnarlius. Because it's sooo cute. http://mud.mm-a6.yimg.com/image/3500796087

2007-02-20 22:31:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers