Has anyone noticed that the main method of attack toward liberals and democrats is by calling them names that better fit themselves?
Is it really some kind of psychosis to call a democrat "unamerican" while you are trying to limit the freedoms of Americans?
Or to call spying on people "The Patriot Act"?
Or to say that God punished Louisiana with a hurricane for having a few gay bars while giving your money to Ted Haggard?
Or even on a fundamental level, to go to "war against terrorism".
To celebrate Fox News and Rupert Murdoch as being "conservative" when they paid OJ Simpson $1 Million to write a book about how he "got away with it."
Why can't they see the obvious errors in their thinking when confronted with them?
Surely there must be some explanation in the DSM...
2007-02-20 13:36:28 · 3 answers · asked by rabble rouser 6 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
I've seen it too.
When you are a lying, thieving snake you have to use other people's words because you know yours is no good.
Check y!A in the next few days, they will plagiarize your comments and accuse us of the same things.
2007-02-20 13:42:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The problem is, they are no more wrong or right than you are. You try to sound intellectual and open minded, but you actually prove that your many of your points about conservatives (I'm assuming that you are directing your question toward ALL conservatives) holds true in yourself, therefore (another assumption, I know) liberals as well. Anyway.....just an observation.
2007-02-20 21:50:26 · answer #2 · answered by wildraft1 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yep.
Can't make a missle long or thick enough.
2007-02-20 21:38:50 · answer #3 · answered by Geico Caveman 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋