that likes oxycotin, today when he was trying to trivialize the deaths of American troops in Iraq??
2007-02-20 12:04:18 · 11 answers · asked by jj 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
me to Jesi its called being able to work in an environment where i am allowed to listen to the radio, because i make the rules.
2007-02-20 12:08:59 · update #1
patriot07, i don't think i was hearing what i want to hear, when he says, "only a little over 300 died so far in Iraq, that is less than....such and such time."
that is trying to trivialize deaths of the 300+ who have died so far.
2007-02-20 12:10:46 · update #2
3000+ i mean. and no nothing was being taken out of context.
he was verbally attacking people that don't like that fact that 3000+ of our boys have died in Iraq so far.
it is pretty hard to take a statment like that out of context.
2007-02-20 12:13:07 · update #3
It relatively relies upon on your information superhighway bandwidth, or in different words, how briskly your information superhighway connection is. in case you have extreme speed information superhighway (DSL or CABLE) then you definately might desire to be basically high quality listening to your interior of sight radio and surfing on a similar time. yet one extra element is needed, and that's a close-by radio station it incredibly is streaming this is programming directly to the information superhighway.
2016-10-02 11:32:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I must have missed that part.Was driving through Columbus and paying attention to traffic.
2007-02-20 12:09:15 · answer #2 · answered by HITLERY 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like Druggie Limbaugh. I'm not surprised.
2007-02-20 12:07:30 · answer #3 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Who are you talking about? It could be Rush. If it is, why should I listen to a windbag who never had an original thought in his life? (In spite of his drug intake?)
2007-02-20 12:09:26 · answer #4 · answered by bob h 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I stopped listening to Rush a long time ago. I don't need to be told what to think.
2007-02-20 12:08:22 · answer #5 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Ummm... if he's fat, stupid and impotent, I think I know who he is. Wretch, Rash, Ratched... something like that.
2007-02-20 12:09:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
of course, it's onlt a number after all, doesn't mean anything.
2007-02-20 12:07:23 · answer #7 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that's what they do best, marginalize the poor in life and in death.
2007-02-20 12:08:01 · answer #8 · answered by FOX NEWS WATCHER 1 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I wike Wush, he's awways wight. He he he he he he he.
2007-02-20 12:08:17 · answer #9 · answered by Elmer Fudd Tewwowist Huntew 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
taking things out of context again?????
2007-02-20 12:10:20 · answer #10 · answered by al s 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋