do u guys feel that Kidd will give that lakers a little spark o there still be the same?
2007-02-20 10:51:39 · 21 answers · asked by LifesJourney 3 in Sports ➔ Basketball
i feel that bringing kid into the lakers wouldnt really matter Kidd can play some D and can pass that basketball around so good but putting him on the lakers rosters wouldnt make a difference
2007-02-20 12:28:02 · answer #1 · answered by AMBG 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Jason Kidd will give the Lakers a spark because he is already being pushed by Marcus Williams. The Lakers don't have a true point guard and they need a better distributor. Smush Parker can be a big contributor off of the bench. If the trade goes down, it'll be interesting to see who is in the deal.
2007-02-20 10:56:38 · answer #2 · answered by The Dude 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Kidd is good, but I don't think he would be a major asset to the Lakers. Kobe would still run the show. Also, Kidd is getting old. He doesn't have a whole lot left in the tank.
2007-02-20 10:55:28 · answer #3 · answered by Tikimaskedman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your Point Guard needs to have a reliable outside shooting touch if you are running the triangle offense and phil Jackson knows this having employed Ron Harper, Brian Shaw, Steve Kerr, BJ armstrong and John Paxson 2 name a few> Jason Kidd should be called ASON Kidd because he has no J. But if Phil lets his team improvise on the go and doesnt force them into half court sets evrytime down court just because he has a true point 2 do so they will thrive because Kidd likes 2 feed and Kobe likes 2 Hog
2007-02-20 11:24:30 · answer #4 · answered by Lord Vader 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they will be the same, until they get the player who really made that team good back, Shaq. It's funny how everyone thought Kobe was the Lakers star, and the team has sucked ever since Shaq left.
Jason Kidd is one of the most over rated basketball players in NBA history. He can pass the ball, but plays minimal defense, he is a below average shooter, and his ball handle is decent at best. He wouldn't make much of a difference on any team.
2007-02-20 10:55:57 · answer #5 · answered by answerman 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ha there would be no spark... All I have to say is I hope Kidd likes to run... He can lose some weight watching the "Kobe show" (Plus with those 2 personalities Kobe would probably try to rape kidd in the A** and Kidd would try to beat Kobe up... But that's just me)
2007-02-20 10:59:35 · answer #6 · answered by Str8ballin23JK 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i in my opinion like that commerce, will no longer be able to assert I tell that to human beings too generally using this commerce gadget. The Lakers get a reliable factor shelter to push the pace and get the ball to Kobe and additionally Kidd might incredibly make Bynum functional in L.A. And the Nets get a reliable 3-factor shooter, an exceptionally reliable versatile participant in Odom, and then on a similar time as paying for and advertising Kidd might look like backcourt suicide, a Farmar-Marcus Williams blend does no longer be too undesirable alongside with of Vinsanity. reliable commerce, has potential.
2016-10-16 03:16:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Spark
2007-02-20 10:54:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is the trade rumor and kidd even admited it and i think if kidd does go to l.a kobe would be better and would be able to shoot more often but i dont think it will take them to the finals
2007-02-20 12:08:12 · answer #9 · answered by ballin boy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think it would make the lakers a contender for the title. kidd is very unslefish and a great passer. putting that with kobes scoring and you have a great tandem
2007-02-20 10:54:08 · answer #10 · answered by James 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋