Most all drugs can be traced in a single hair strand, even asprin after 20-30 minutes.
Twenty inches of hair holds forty months of info regarding one's past "actions." Do you think she was trying to destroy evidence?
2007-02-20 10:37:36 · 14 answers · asked by Incognito 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Ignorance - Once Brit's locks are sold they become the property of the buyer. Authorities would need a court order to take possession of her hair long enough to test it. I doubt seriously they would go that far. This was presented on Cnn, Fox News and during an interview with Danny Bonaduce and a Hollywood Insider who knows Kfed and Britney personally. Not as far fetched as you seem to think and maybe they know something you don't....
2007-02-26 20:58:26 · update #1
Besides, her hair was probably confiscated off the floor or wastebasket without her knowledge or permission.
Neither party is fit to have those babies, money or not. I never once said she would lose custody....look at Whitney Houston.
2007-02-26 21:06:17 · update #2
Jude - Really? I had no idea people had hair on other parts of their body. Looks like some other people came to this same realization.
Trace amounts of drug metabolites become entrapped in the core of the hair as it grows out from the body at a rate of approximately one-half inch per month. These drug residues cannot be washed, bleached or flushed out and are stable over time. A laboratory analysis of the hair fiber from an individual will produce an accurate drug history for that person.
The minimum hair sample must be the equivalent of 50 strands of hair, 1 1/2 inches in length cut 1/4 inch from the scalp.
Body hair growth rates vary and are slower than head hair. Most body hair is genetically controlled and replaced within one year. Therefore, it is difficult to accurately represent the time period of a standard screen with body hair
2007-02-28 03:41:40 · update #3
Not that i know of. I think she is just crazy. I'm glad she did it though, gave me a good laugh.
2007-02-20 10:45:01 · answer #1 · answered by Kalinakona 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that's it at all. When Esther's Hair Salon owner, Esther Tognozzi, refused to shave Britney's hair saying that it would be a bit too drastic of her, Britney ignored Esther and grabbed the buzzer and buzzed her hair off. When exiting the hair salon, along with a bodyguard and small posse, Esther asked Britney if she was turning over a new leaf, the pop-tart replied by saying, "Something like that." Once outside, Ms. Spears dodged paparazzi and fans trying to get ahold of why she went this far, Britney was settled into a car, which drove away from Esther's, immediately.
2007-02-20 10:56:53 · answer #2 · answered by sPrInG LiLY 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That sure is right. I remember E mentioning that she wanted to be ridden of drug evidence. Now, a fan had it. That was dumb. She should've shaved her head and burned the evidence.
2007-02-27 16:56:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Surly you will get a drug try pattern with dermis, blood, different hair besides. i think of she is in simple terms mindlessly tryign to discover intending to her existence. She theory having youngsters might do it yet for sure it did no longer. i've got faith kinda sorry for her. her mothers and dads do no longer look doing a lot reliable..properly in line with hazard they are, who knows yet what you examine in the click.
2016-10-16 03:14:06 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
trust me it had nothin to do with custody ! she doesnt need to do anythin to be sure she'll have her kids all to her self... kfed does nothin.. hes nothin.. hes a loser with 2 kids already in the past and hes done nothin to support em or wateva....so yeah britney probably jus needs a makeover and she can be rest assured her kids will be stayin with her.. cause she can afford to take care of them till theyre old and wrinkley while kfed has zip !!!and accordin to ur theory if she was tryin to destroy evidence why on earth would she allow her hair to be sold on ebay i mean cmon man... i hope ur not plannin on becoming a detective or lawyer in the future.. cause id seriously advice a career change to u !
2007-02-26 20:28:58 · answer #5 · answered by I V X 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That an interesting theory. If that what she was thinking it backfired. Sher could lose her kids any day now.
2007-02-26 11:22:13 · answer #6 · answered by studnet 15 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think she did it because she was so fed up with relationships that she wanted to make herself unattractive so that no man would want to even go near her.
2007-02-20 10:49:28 · answer #7 · answered by dishwasher67 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope.
She's just coco bananas.
Enjoy the ride.
2007-02-20 10:40:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no she shaved after having depression and because sheshaving problems with her relationship.
2007-02-20 10:45:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have a wonderful imagination.........um she has hair on other parts of her body,
2007-02-28 00:49:02 · answer #10 · answered by holly 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋