To include straights. That is, should straights not be able to admit to being in a heterosexual relationship for fear of being subject to a discharge. I just think that heterosexuals in the Military might be demoralizing for some of the troops, y'know?
2007-02-20 10:19:22 · 4 answers · asked by collegedebt 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
actually I think the whole thing should be disbanded or taken out of the military policy. It didn't used to be that way, why is it now? Let it go, if the gays want to be in the military what difference does it make. They can fight for our country the same as anyone can.
2007-02-20 12:34:22 · answer #1 · answered by jumpinjackdw 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh, i imagine you pick to take this slightly too a recommendations. so a recommendations because the "do not ask do not tell" coverage is in touch, i'm for it. even if someone is gay or no longer has no which means at the same time as someone is at the front line. gay human beings do no longer frame of mind a hetrosexual individual, they comprehend the adaptation. They follow their own, virtually without exception. The Greeks had all gay adult men in a number of their armies & they were said warring parties. The Greeks felt that in case you loved your significant different it would make you a extra appropriate fighter, to guard one yet another. also, they did not pick their troops to develop into connected to the ladies human beings in conquered lands, subsequently ensuing in a lack of loyalty to at least some thing of the troops.
2016-12-04 10:40:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's only fair. They should't be allowed to make any references to being straight: no jokes, no cartooons, no flirting, dating, bragging, pin-ups, billfold photos, etc.
2007-02-20 10:24:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm glad to know that at least someone has their priorities straight. You are so right. : )
2007-02-20 10:24:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋