because the majority of the news media is far left. That Socialist pig (not liberal) can walk on water like the Kennedy's.
2007-02-20 10:20:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by El P 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bill Clinton went to Rwanda and apologized for not doing enough to prevent that.
There's a big lie about Hillary on this. Here are the facts:
Claim: Hillary Clinton helped free two Black Panthers accused of torturing and murdering Alex Rackley.
Status: False.
Versions of the e-mailed denunciation headed "Paul Harvey's 'The rest of the story'" began circulating on the Internet in June 2000. This header plus a comment at the end of the text ("And now, as Paul Harvey says, you know the rest of the story") caused some to believe Paul Harvey had read this piece (or a shorter version of it) on the air. Paul Harvey's people confirm he has never broadcast the Panthers and Hillary Clinton story.
Last updated: 18 September 2005
The URL for this page is http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/panthers.asp
Urban Legends Reference Pages © 1995-2007
by Barbara and David P. Mikkelson
This material may not be reproduced without permission.
Sources Sources:
Brock, David. The Seduction of Hillary Rodham.
New York: Free Press, 1996. ISBN 0-684-83451-0 (pp. 30-35).
Claiborne, William. "Brewster: From Yale to the Court of St. James's."
The Washington Post. 8 April 1977 (p. B1).
Elvin, John. "Hillary Hides Her Panther Fling."
Insight. 31 July 2000.
Freed, Daniel. Agony in New Haven: The Trial of Bobby Seale, Erika Huggins, and the Black Panther Party.
New York: Simon and Schuster, 1973.
McCaslin, John. "Hillary for the Defense."
The Washington Times. 12 June 1998.
Rierden, Andi. "Once a Black Panther, Always a Cause."
The New York Times. 22 November 1992 (p. CN1).
West, Diana. "The '60s Strike Back."
The Washington Times. 5 February 1999.
Journal of Blacks in Higher Education. "Former Black Panthers Who Have Turned to Higher Education."
31 October 1998 (p. 62).
2007-02-20 18:22:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mike H 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Do you seriuosly believe the republican controlled congress would have given him approval to intervene in Rwanda? They gave him a hard time enough about Kosovo, but that was a NATO operation. While Clinton can be faulted for not proposong an intervention in Rwanda, it is clear there was no support for such an action and that's why he didn't try.
2007-02-20 18:21:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
The same reason Bush got a pass on Darfur....The difference is that Clinton had to fight a Republican Congress and Bush had a Republican Congress and just chose to ignore the carnage.
2007-02-20 18:43:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Because Republicans don't care about Rwanda..
2007-02-20 18:19:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Dems never burn their own. Rwanda was a mass killing field and yet bish fights a way more ligitimate battle and gets no slack.
2007-02-20 18:24:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
He's a Democrat. Democrats control the media. The media controls public opinion.
2007-02-20 19:27:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by quarterback 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
What about Bush and Abu Grhaib?????
Question: Have you ever noticed how liberals attempt to tell you how you feel?
Question Details: I see the hatred and lies in your questions.... ... and it reminds me of when I was a Republican. That last question you asked for example. You call yourself "honest"? Conservative hatemongers/warmongers/empty lib bashers do it all the time. So please, cut the crap.
Deleted Answer: I see the hatred and lies in your questions.... ... and it reminds me of when I was a Republican. That last question you asked for example. You call yourself "honest"? Conservative hatemongers/warmongers/empty lib bashers do it all the time. So please, cut the crap.
Reason of Violation:Insulting Other Participants
thanks!
2007-02-21 10:59:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cut The Crap 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why does Bush get a pass for Darfur ? I'll tell you why, because we can't be running all over the world being the Chief of Police.
2007-02-20 18:20:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Count Acumen 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
For the same reason Bush continues to ignore Sudan and Zimbabwe.
2007-02-20 18:19:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Hemingway 4
·
1⤊
1⤋