The egg....cause if something went deformed inside the egg, we have been able to get todays modern chicken. Get it?
2007-02-20 09:07:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by ~*Natasha*~ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it has not been proven scientifically whether the chicken or the egg came first. But since Biblical times, the church father have sided with the chicken, they pointed out that according to book of Genesis, God created the creatures, not their reproductive units. On the other side, those who accord priority to the egg believe that a chicken is just an egg's way of making another egg. This is in line with modern-day interpretation of genetics, which sees organisms as the means by which particular sets of genes are assured of their survival. Commonsense reasoning, however, will tell us that neither preceded the other, and that neither could exist without the other. Going beyond the controversy, we reiterate that eggs existed long before chickens did, there is no dispute on this point because eggs are millions of years older than birds. Gallus domesticus, the chickens as we know it more or less, is a scant 4 - 5 thousand years old, and quite a late-corner compared to other domesticated animals such as sheep and goats.
2007-02-20 16:30:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by totallywirednyc 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
God made ppl before they had babies,so it just naturally goes that the chicken came first,then laid the egg.
2007-02-20 11:12:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Frogmama2007 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The chicken but not as we know it today. Today chicken is G. engineered.The original probable a relative of the dinasaur. Now how is that for useless infomation?
2007-02-20 09:24:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by yellow b 2
·
0⤊
0⤋