2007-02-20 08:31:18 · 20 answers · asked by Ethan M 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We should get the US out of the UN and return to our traditional foreign policy of Isolationism. That means bringing all the troops home and using them to defend our country if its ever attacked.
Then we should evict the UN from that building and make it a monument to America or something.
Then we should secure our borders and pass a Constitutional Amendment banning the US from ever joining any World Government scheme.
2007-02-20 08:49:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The UN does not have a World domination plan seeing as how its members are most of the countries in the World. It was created mainly by America and European countries so guess whose interest it mainly served? - afterall which countries contribute the most funds?
Now that the UN actually represents most of the countries in the World and everyone's voice gets to be heard, there are people in America calling to abandon it!
Yes it is flawed and needs fixing but the US helped create it so help fix it. Don't walk away because the rest of the World is willing to stand up and call a spade a spade, and lecture the US on bad policies (as well as other countries).
The US didn't support the League of Nations and it collapsed but the UN would not collapse without the US. The US would merely become an outsider.
2007-02-20 08:45:35 · answer #2 · answered by David M 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
wow man. are you dumb? do you want the us to be the sole power in the world??? dont you get what your govt is doing? they're making you think that an institution set up by nations to stop wars is corrupt and inept! the UN is made up of 200 nations. the world is a diverse place with different views different cultures, and not everyone holds the same ideals that the US is trying to impose. Without the UN things could not be resolved peacefully. think about it. during the cuban missle crisis. what would the us have done without the un? attacked cuba and then what? nuclear war. so dont start thinking that because the UN didnt allow the US to invade iraq in the beginning because they didnt find those WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, that the UN is corrupt and trying to stop the US from doing whatever it wants. well thats what it does. keeps nations from attacking whoever they want but unfortunately the bush administration just made the world a lot more dangerous and angry
2007-02-20 09:12:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The UN has no such plan. The UN cannot even get its member nations to listen to any plan they come up with to keep from one nation attacking another. All of the members don't even pay their dues to belong. If anyone runs the UN, it is America, we pay them no mind. We do as we please. How in the world could they ever get all 192 members to get together & plan a world take over? Dream on!
2007-02-20 08:46:01 · answer #4 · answered by geegee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a obscure question. Any particular experience of WW2 which you opt for rationalization on? Are you searching for the economics or political or international view...throw us a bone right here. Germany invaded Poland in 1939 that particularly lots in contact all of europe simply by fact the Blitzkreig strated to comb via Europe the countries that have been area of the League of countries began to mobilize to help with the different countries in contact. The blitzkreig then replaced guidelines from going in direction of russia to sweeping Belgium and France. the French and the English retreated to Dunkirk the place in a miracle the Brits have been rescued via their countrymen. the US replaced into nevertheless hiding her head in the sand being isolationist and imparting help. December 1941 the eastern who have been an best buddy of the Germans desperate it replaced into time to attack the US and harm her pacific fleet. They often succeeded with a sneak attack at Pearl Harbor, yet as a eastern admiral replaced into quoted as asserting "i'm afraid we've woken a drowsing significant." the US conflict gadget went into extreme equipment and particularly of basically sending help we began sending troops and equipment. conflict replaced into particularly lots declared via all fascinated events with the Russians switching factors. Does that help in any respect?
2016-10-02 11:16:45 · answer #5 · answered by persinger 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So wait. The United Nations, which is comprised of representatives from most nations in the world, is, according to you, trying to "dominate" the world, and you have a problem with that? So you don't believe in the right of the people to govern themselves, then?
2007-02-20 08:38:39 · answer #6 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The United States controls the United Nations, along with Israel, so I´d start there.
2007-02-20 08:38:18 · answer #7 · answered by Honest Opinion 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The UN's bloated corrupt bureaucracy can't take over the break room at the UN building. They'll destroy themselves long before they try to take over the world.
2007-02-20 08:42:18 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. Pibb 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are you trying to do wreck our American economy. Our economy is tied to other countries abroad. We could easily hit skid row if countries decided to back out in investing in USA technology, transportant equipment, products. In fact we owe China and Japan billions of dollars.
2007-02-20 08:50:06 · answer #9 · answered by mac 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hahaha!! The UN doesn't even have the power to enforce it's own sanctions and threats. It is hardly a threat to anyone.
2007-02-20 08:35:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋