If it wasn't for Nader, Al Gore would have been President and 3,000 more American soldiers would still be with us, he still insists that there was no difference between the two candidates, sorry to say that growing up he was one of my heroes.
2007-02-20 08:47:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Most people who answer this question will say Bush is the terrible man who started the war. They are morons. If you go back a few years, and listen to a few of the tapes from congress when Bill was still president, you will learn a great deal about how the war was already escalating. Like I said, though, most of the people nowadays in the U.S. are media idiots. They only know what the liberal press shoves down their throats. I recently listened to Nancy Pelosis give a speech from 1998 where she all but says she herself wanted to go in and invade Iraq to save America. Now she gives speeches about how Bush has ruined everything by starting a war. Realize that politicians lie, but if you are too stupid to understand that, just write DOWN WITH BUSH, BECAUSE THE TV TOLD ME SO!!!!
2016-05-23 23:35:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Uh, you're throwing around the term "pontius pilate" but it is obvious that you don't understand the term.
Bush is not washing his hands of the fate of either the Iraqis or the US troops. He has made it quite clear that he is fully responsible and accountable.
It is people like Hillary and Hagel and Kerry, who voted for it, but now want to back off, who are trying to wash their hands of some imaginary blood, and take no responsibility for their prior support. They are doing this for personal political gain. As long as we're using Biblical references, let's call them "Judases", selling out our troops for the "silver" of political power.
Oh, and Bush won every recount that Gore requested, when the newspapers looked into it, so in the end it didn't matter. But you need to know that it was the Florida supreme court that tried to change election laws after the election, and that the USSC stopped them.
2007-02-20 08:53:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Actually Gore name came first in the case name. He was the one that wanted proof that George did not steal the election. Of course, he could not get this proof because of justices that are all conservative.
Everybody really knows that George is not honest and that he stole the elections. I just wish Al Gore could have been more of a predator, that way he could have stopped him.
2007-02-20 08:59:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lou 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Technically, if you want your rant to be taken seriously, it should be "Bush v. Gore". Supreme Court cases have specific names.
But have a great day anyway.
2007-02-20 08:31:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by theearlybirdy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋