Against Lille he walked off in a paddy after being substituted
Fergy to go........OR Ronaldo????
2007-02-20 08:15:44 · 9 answers · asked by Neill 3 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
Ronaldo will leave for two main reasons.
He's starting to act like a drama-queen. Remember what happened to Beckham (the nation's golden boy) when he started pouting and acting petulant? It turned Fergie's back up and created bad feelings between them. It finally drove him away from the club.
Secondly, Ronaldo is young and money is being thrown at him from the biggest clubs in the world now. He get's booed at every Premiership game (which he says doesn't bother him), he has to endure English style football which cramps his fancy style, and last of all he's young. He's going to follow his ego all the way to Barca.
Any of us would do the same.
Fergie will remain as he always has and United will remain a dominating force in football as they always have.
2007-02-20 20:08:44 · answer #1 · answered by quay_grl 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Man U discovered Ronaldo in a friendly against sporting where he was dribbling the whole defence and all the players where interested in him...
This can easily tell he was good before coming to Man U and despite playing good in Man U, in the national team he plays better which is why their coach suggested that he leaves Man U for Spain and I can guarantee you if he leaves to spain he'll make the best player in the world.
Thanx!
2007-02-20 19:37:49 · answer #2 · answered by Invasion 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither we need both, Ronaldo was well shut out of the game by 2 players constantly marking him.
2007-02-20 08:56:39 · answer #3 · answered by richard_beckham2001 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I HATE Fergusson
transfered Tim Howard, telling him he'll be back next year after Van der Sar's contract is up
two days later gives Van der Sar an extention
like he didn't know
no class
2007-02-20 08:32:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is only one Ronaldo lol, the other one is a gimp.
I'd as Ronaldo as the he was prolific in several leagues and at the highest stand in Europe, a lot of Romarios stats are based off playing in Brazil.
For example Romario goal rate was 53% when at Barc Ronaldos was 97%.
Romario had a better goal rate at PSV, but had 4 years more experience when he started there.
The clincher for me is that i have always believe Ronaldo was the perfect striker, 2 good feet good with his head very quick with and with out the ball strong he had everything.
Romario wasn't good with his head, a lot of his goals were reliant on his speed, and being feed in a certain way. Yeah his footballing brain was probably better than Ronaldos, as he found space a lot better and was a lot quicker in terms of reaction, how ever if a team got his number as many did he was shut out.
Ronaldo had more depth to his game IMO, so he say him.
2016-07-03 22:25:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably but not without the acting skills of 1960 war film actor they really know how to dive dont they!
2007-02-20 08:29:23 · answer #6 · answered by dr strangelove 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably - I think his class would have shown through where ever he was. No need for his hissy fit though!!
2007-02-20 08:21:26 · answer #7 · answered by splandastic 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably stacking shelves at tesco
2007-02-20 08:21:41 · answer #8 · answered by amos 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
oklah... but i will not know him because he not a man u player
and not so popular
2007-02-20 17:51:17 · answer #9 · answered by doremon 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋