Only for the people who would never vote for a woman for the Presidency...?

Question

Why do you feel a woman would be wrong for the job of President of the United States of America?

Answer 1

Well, let's see, women are far too compassionate. Traditionally, the leader of the "free" world is a brutish, war monger, so having a human who actually cares about other humans in charge would throw the entire Testosterone festival into an uproar.

Men would suddenly have to THINK before they took action and
(GASP!) they would be forced to have ( dare I say it?) CONVERSATIONS with other leaders BEFORE they took their weapons and bombed the crap out of them.

A woman leader would get rid of the good old boy networks, make sure EVERYONE was fed, had health care, was safe and educated and she would invite freindships with other nations instead of stockpiling weapons and having nuclear pissing contests with crazy people.

A woman would have PEACE as a goal rather than world domination and it would be more important to her that the people of the USA were happy than that they were stinking rich.

Yeah, that would be "terrible."

Now go to your room and think about that.

Answer 2

The only reason someone would NEVER vote for a woman president is if they were sexist. Are you? A woman president is what this country needs since women are more calm then men and aren't as likely to run blindly into a desperate war for no reson like Bush did. What proff is there that a woman president would be the nd for America? Who knows, it might be the start of an Golden Age for modern America. Don't be so quick to judge something that hasn't even occurred yet. If a woman becomes president and does a horrible job, then you can complain, so save your criticism.

Answer 3

If a person were to vote for a woman to become president, in this case the obvious Hillary Clinton, the person voting wouldn't belive it to be a mistake. To assume a person is not fit for a job because of their sex, is ignorant, prejudiced, and wrong. Hillary CLinton is in fact one of the most qualified presidential candidates out there. She has been in the white house for 8 years, working behind the scenes, she has been a politician, and a lawyer for many many many years. She is a US senator, she is obviously strong, controlled, and fair. No one has gone through what she has gone through so gracefully, and responsibly. She is more than fit for the job.

Answer 4

Has there ever been a woman canidate for President in any party? Anyways...I have to say that I have no qualms with a woman leader. Thatcher did great in the UK. American women are best women in the world and can lead the most powerful country in the world.

Answer 5

Hillary reminds me of one of those "dragon lady" corporate women with puffy shoulder pads who have a mission to prove to the world that a woman is as strong as a man. I just can't stand that. Plus I think she would have problems dealing with foreign policy issues. Leave the leadership role to the men. We'll just have a whole new set of issues to deal with if she were President.

Answer 6

In this case many reasons. The ME culture considers women weak and would probably force her into a corner. Certain correspondence re childcare reveal Socialistic leanings plus the many pardons of such by hubby. Also BClinton was instrumental in letting Loren Corp sell hi-tech info to China, enabling them to perfect their missiles to shoot down protective satellites.

Answer 7

Do people not realize that many other countries have women as heads of state?

Answer 8

this might not be an answer to your question, but i have a feeling that once we do have a woman president, it will continue to be a woman in office for a long time

Answer 9

Not necessarily, just _that_ woman. Hilliary is definitely NOT stable enough to be in a position of power.
Neither is Nancy, but that's another story.

Answer 10

Let's elect hillary and have another clinton make a joke out of the whitehouse.