possible to theorize about a theoretical theory, yet in theory, the theorizing is theoretically nothing more then a theory that has been threorized to the point of being a flawed theory, yet in theory it is still theoretically possible to be a proven theory, yet only in the hypothetical sense of theorum. Is this hypothetical or is it just another theory?
2007-02-20 07:30:11 · 11 answers · asked by Jim R 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
holy crap you just used past,future,present,and every other version of that word.i think its a theory
2007-02-20 08:45:32 · answer #1 · answered by wamzy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You're doing great on your T words. Turn the dictionary page and usurp some usefulness of the ubiquitous U page.
2007-02-20 15:35:47 · answer #2 · answered by Captain Jack 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Since no proof can prove a proven fool-proof proofreader, I can't prove it one way or da udder.
2007-02-20 15:33:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is just a theory..needs work...
2007-02-20 15:33:21 · answer #4 · answered by metoo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're right. In theory.
2007-02-20 15:32:46 · answer #5 · answered by mreed316 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
something smells like an informal fallacy
2007-02-20 15:35:17 · answer #6 · answered by Circlometry™³ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Too fuzzy, brain overload.
2007-02-20 15:32:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My f**king head is going to explode. AHHHHHHHHHHHHH : 0
2007-02-20 15:34:11 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Another practice of "if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bull sh**t."
2007-02-20 15:34:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
oh brain hurts!
2007-02-20 15:33:32 · answer #10 · answered by ♥ ltlsunny ♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋