All these Republicans have stated that global warming is real, it's happening now, it's caused by humans, and we need to take action to stop it.
However, the global warming deniers seem to think it's just Democrats who agree with the scientific consensus on this issue.
So do the GW deniers on this site think all these Republicans are lying when they say this?
Isn't it time that we stopped seeing this as a Republican vs. Democrat issue, and started talking about solutions?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2023835.stm
http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/articles/br_1945.asp?t=t
http://mccain.senate.gov/press_office/view_article.cfm?id=412 (McCain proposes cap/trade system)
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/02/12/BAGPIO3E3O4.DTL (Giuliani: consensus on human impact is overwhelming)
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2007/jan/31/brownback_its_time_tackle_global_warming/?politics (Sam Brownback)
2007-02-20 05:56:50 · 14 answers · asked by Steve 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sorry but it is hard to take anything that Al Gore says seriously. His little docudrama is a joke.
2007-02-20 06:01:17 · answer #1 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋
i don't comprehend, yet i comprehend this: whilst Al Gore become working for vice chairman in 1992, he insisted many times lower back that the 1st element he might do could be to collect a set of professionals from each and every field (scientists, industrialists, etc.) to artwork on coming up new option power factors. IN 8 YEARS, HE DID no longer something OF the kind. Al Gore's roots are in super oil, and he's a globalist, a hideous mixture! Why did they kill the electrical powered automobile? How can super oil make money off of an electric powered automobile?? The "Earth shape" and "schedule 21" at the instant are not on the subject of the ambience, they are all approximately administration, specially with the help of international bankers, over the whole planet.
2016-09-29 09:22:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one has shown me the scientific chain of evidence that links any human activity to being the cause for global warming. It's just like trying to prove that there is a law that requires Americans to pay their personal income taxes. Or the whole theory of evolution.
The fact is the morons you mentioned in your question are all puppets for the owners of the Federal Reserve just like Clinton, Obama and so forth. They don't have any chain of evidence to substantiate this global warming nonsense any more than anyone is able to debate me in public that the Federal Reserve isn't a privately owned corporation.
Where's the evidence? Science, from it's very essence, requires a chain of evidence. Everything the global warming crowd is saying about human activity causing global warming is done out of either ignorance because there is no chain of evidence to substantiate that ludricrous line of thinking or it's a blatant attempt to exercise their political agenda.
The Democrats are not immune to big government, high taxes, fiscal irresponsibility, increased regulation, red tape and reliance upon government anymore than Republicans. My question is: if liberals are really for the people then why is it that the Democrats pay homage to the owners of the Federal Reserve rather than seek to abolish it?
2007-02-20 06:16:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do any of you youngsters remember about 30 years ago when the eco-freaks claimed that acetylene ( a gas used in welding) was destroying the ozone layer? Well our government agreed with them and their solution was to place a massive tax on acetylene. Now the eco-freaks have decided that we have global warming and of course our government agrees with them again and soon we will have another large tax to pay. Makes me wonder what the next eco-tax will be. Oh, and by the way there is no hard scientific facts to prove global warming, just a "consensus" by the Eco-freaks and liberal politicians.
2007-02-20 06:13:56 · answer #4 · answered by bill j 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are Bush, McCain, Giuliani, and Brownback are saying this?
Hummmmmmm I guess they started believing Al Gore. They said it was not happing when they wanted the automobiles money to get into office. I guess since they are not running this year they can say, yes it is America's falt and we need to stop it now.
2007-02-20 06:07:09 · answer #5 · answered by jeeccentricx2 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It shows that Republicans are always very slow to see the obvious.
I wonder how long Fox News is going to take to see the light?
Possibly when the tops of our heads start frying?
Maybe not even then.
2007-02-20 06:06:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No they're not lying but maybe they should have waited for the actual results of the scientific study that still hasn't been released rather than the summary that was released for political reasons.
2007-02-20 06:05:58 · answer #7 · answered by Doug 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don't expect any legitimate answers to this question. Bush's many, many comments on global warming throughout his years in office fall on deaf ears as far as neocons are concerned.
2007-02-20 06:03:05 · answer #8 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No they are not if that's what they are saying. Unfortunately I have heard much of the opposite from some of those you mention.
It is easy to talk the talk. Now let us see them walk the walk.
2007-02-20 06:02:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Global Warming is junk science. I don't care who believe in it. It is like evolution. It is junk. It doesn't make it legitimate science because the Pope believes in it.
This question was framed from a liberal mind set. As a liberal, all you know is following what your commissars and leaders say. It doesn't even occur to you that people could support the president and not believe what he says about an issue.
How sad Liberals are...
2007-02-20 06:05:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bush must be a lying lib commie, who just wants to get at Bush, right cons?
2007-02-20 06:03:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋