So, is that compatible with the initiate's philosophy?

Question

What You think about the combination of aggressiveness and the fact of being an initiate. If you are obliged to be very aggressive in your profession for instance, if you have to defend other colleagues or make negotiations with the government, and so on, you are obliged to be aggressive to defend the people. After that, you sometimes feel very wrong because you say, "Okay, I am an initiate. All this day I was very aggressive, it was bad." But I am aggressive for the good things, to defend people.

Answer 1

TO BE FRANK ONE NEED NOT BE AGGRESSIVE AT ALL.

AGGRESSIVE APPROACHES WILL NOT WORK THESE DAYS,I SUPPOSE.

WHY AT ALL IT IS NECESSARY TO BE AGGRESSIVE ,IF THE POINT YOU DRIVE ACROSS IS FRANK,STRAIGHT FORWARD AND BENEFICIAL TO BOTH OR TO THE ELIGIBLE PARTNER?

INSTEAD OF BEING AGGRESSIVE, ONE CAN BE POLITE,FAIR AND FIRM IN HIS VIEWS, APPROACH WHILE DRIVING THE POINT ACROSS A NEGOTIATING TABLE.

THE OBJECTIVE MUST BE A "WIN-WIN" SITUATION.

APPROACH CAN BE PROFESSIONAL BUT NOT AGGRESSIVE .

AGGRESSIVE APPROACH (CONTAINS EGO FACTOR) IS NOT CONDUCIVE NOW-A-DAYS .iT WILL LEAD TO CONFRONTATION.

WHAT HAPPENS IF THE OTHER PARTY IS ALSO AGGRESSIVE ?

EVEN IF YOU ARE RIGHT,IT IS BETTER TO BE EXTREMELY POLITE TO WIN THE CONFIDENCE OF THE OTHER.

AGGRESSIVE APPROACH MAY BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTER-PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP AND IT WILL LEAD TO MANY FAILURES.

THE OBJECTIVE AND MOTIVE MUST BE TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A VERY FRIENDLY RELATIONSHIP AND IT LEADS TO POSITIVE RESULTS FAVOURABLE TO BOTH PARTIES MAKING A DEAL.

THE WHOLE WORLD OF HUMANITY REVOLVES AROUND GOOD HUMAN RELATIONSHIP BE AT HOME OR AT OFFICE OF IN THE GOVERNMENT OR BETWEEN GOVERNMENTS OR BETWEEN COUNTRIES, TO FIND AMICABLRE SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS OF ANY SORT.

NEITHER POWER ,NOR AGGRESSIVE APPROACH WILL BRING RESULTS AND SETTLEMENTS TO ISSUES THAT HAUNT THE SOCIETY.

NO ONE NEED TO BE AGGRESSIVELY OR BLINDLY DEFENDED AND SUPPORTED.
THE TRUTH WILL STAND BY ITSELF.