squirmed his way out of the war, does he have a right to lead our troops if he couldnt endure the sacrifice hes asking for our troops?
http://www.realchange.org/bushjr.htm#vietnam
2007-02-20 05:00:23 · 14 answers · asked by writersbIock2006 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
beachman -- it wouldnt be considered a valid arguement if we didnt have the peanut gallery present. thanks for your contribution, not hit the road you quack
2007-02-20 05:13:42 · update #1
He and other chickenhawks are like that. They have no problem sending other people to do what they would not do for themselves.
2007-02-20 05:04:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
The same right Clinton had. At least Bush went NAG for a time. Bill just left the country.
2007-02-20 13:34:14 · answer #2 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
GW Bush comes from a family of gangsters
grandpa was a Nazi business associate and profiteer
Bush is responsible for the 9/11 attacks and murders
that's what I firmly believe according to the facts and undeniable EVIDENCE
2007-02-20 13:14:30 · answer #3 · answered by spin free 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, and I don't see how he has the right to tell the Generals how to run a war. They have years of experience and the only military experience that Bush has, is fund raising for a congressman, while in the National Guard. Which is no experience at all.
2007-02-20 13:06:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ugh. You again.
The answer is yes. He was voted in with everyone knowing all of his past. Besides, your boy-toy Slick Willie didn't serve either and he commanded our troops in the Balkans.
Double standards are quite your way, aren't they?
ADDITION: Wow. How is it in your world? You really are something else. But I guess you are what makes America so great. Everyone, no matter how stupid, is allowed to speak their mind. You go girl!!!
2007-02-20 13:06:20 · answer #5 · answered by Beachman 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Is it his fault that his National Guard unit was never called into service? That is the most ridiculous argument I've heard.
2007-02-20 13:06:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I guess in much the same way that FDR did. Or Lincoln
2007-02-20 14:30:47 · answer #7 · answered by webbrew 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I BELIEVE THAT GEORGE BUSH HAS THE RIGHT TO LEAD OUR TROOPS INTO WAR JUST AS BILL CLINTON DID. BILL DEMONSTRATED AGAINST OUR COUNTRY DURING THE WAR.
2007-02-20 13:05:20 · answer #8 · answered by dottygoatbeagle 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Its called chicken hawk, and he has every right at the first appointed president of the United States.
2007-02-20 13:03:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Hillary Clinton never enlisted in military service, but people seem to think it's ok for her to be the president. Or is it because she's a woman?
2007-02-20 13:03:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think the question's been rendered academic. He's the ' Commander In Chief ' of record.
2007-02-20 13:03:45 · answer #11 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋