The troops are in or close to position for a war with Iran .
The postureing is done and the ground work laid -
Oh but there are those Democrats in the House -
What to do what to do?
Bush needs an incident .
Iran won't make one - they might be insane but they don't want to fight a super power if they can avoid it.
So an incident needs to happen that would unleash American troops lossen up the purse and allow for WAR
What manufactured incident would be needed for the justification of war with Iran ?
What would they (Iran) have to do and if they won't do it what will the Bush regime have to stage ?
2007-02-20 04:55:55 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Justin P
Was it an Oreo ? Because if it was nuking is too good for the B-s-ta-ds
2007-02-20 05:04:05 · update #1
idiotsres...
Most of the oil consumed by America comes from Canada (check it out yourself bud) and the oil that Iran prodces goes to Europe .
The last couple of wars were because some oil rich nations threatened to use the Euro instead of propping up the US dollar .
No blind hatred of the President here just an objective opinion of stupid policy's he has pulled off .
Oil per barrel might be going down but have you noticed that at the pump? No you haven't because western governments who get about 10% of thier totlat oil needs from Iran are hording for a war and will sell that crude back to Europe so as to further prop up the US currency and put the EU back into it's economic place - 2nd not first as they are so close to doing
2007-02-20 05:10:23 · update #2
A mass killing of our soldiers in Iraq. It won't matter if it is by Shiite (who are armed and funded by Iranian factions) or Sunnis (who are being armed and funded by Saudi factions). He will count on the ignorance of the American people once again just like he did when he invaded Iraq and blamed 9/11 on Saddam. But he's sent enough war ships to the Gulf already and they all have their arms aimed at IRan.
2007-02-20 05:03:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If Bush replaced into totally dedicated to international relatives with Iran, he would not be conversing approximately international conflict III and Rice could be having extreme point talks with Iran's ministers and president. After the NIE, Bush can now no longer say that Iran is on the factor of springing up nuclear weapons, so an excuse is needed. Bush replaced into bellicose final 12 months whilst British sailors have been captured via Iranians and tensions have been extreme adequate then. Loading up the Gulf with much extra US ships and plane businesses feels like a recipe for an air conflict on the least.
2016-10-02 11:03:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The war with Iran began years ago. The Saudis along with the rest of the Arab members of OPEC are keeping oil production up which is putting an economic stranglehold on Iran.
The clerics have reminded Ahmadinejan that they, specifically the Ayatollah runs Iran, not the President. If there is any military action in Iran it will be under the auspices of the UN. The US most likely will not participate.
In the meantime Bush and the Saudis are bankrupting Iran, just like Reagan did to the former Soviet Union.
2007-02-20 05:06:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
In the first place, you're delusional if you believe that the President wants a war with Iran. That's just stupid. In the second place, we're already defeating the Iranian Government without having to fire a shot.
If you weren't so tied up with your blind hatered of the President, you'd have noticed that VP Cheney flew to Saudi Arabia in November and had a talk with the oil shieks. As a result, the price of crude oil has been steadily dropping and the Saudis have stated that they want to keep the price low.
Iran is the world's 2nd largest producer of crude oil but they have no refining capabilities so they are also the 5th largest importer of gasoline. The result of the crude oil price drop and some other things that our President has done and Iran's inflation rate is hovering at about 50%
The people of Iran won't put up with this for much longer and the government will fall, without us having to fire a shot. It's too bad that you're so consumed by your hate for our leaders that you are blinded to what they are doing to keep you safe. Have a nice life.
2007-02-20 05:04:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Iran is a bigger threat than Iraq was. We should've been there before Iraq. Iran has been harboring Ill will against us since Iran Hostage Crisis during the Carter Admin. And I am almost sure they have WMD's. This answer would normally justify me as a Trigger Happy Republican, but I am a Peace Happy Democrat. Normally.
2007-02-20 05:16:04 · answer #5 · answered by The Hitman 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That madman he keeps trying!
Pointing fingers at Iran insurgents and through this report...
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-12-08-saudis-sunnis_x.htm
It is obvious that Saudi Arabian backed Sunnis are causing the most damage to our troops!!!
Yet Bush still says it is Iran!!
Stay tuned I'm sure he and the PNAC will come up with something!!!
2007-02-20 05:05:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
To think that Bush 'needs' incidents to go to war is (on paper) correct. He can't (or at least shouldn't) go to war for no reason. However to suggest he would WANT incidents to happen is flat out childish.
--
As for what Iran has ALREADY done, they've paid off terrorist cells in Iraq who kill our troops, threaten to wipe Isreal off the map simply because they're Jewish, verbally assaulted countries who try to stand up against them, and continue to ignore and defy pleadings they stop (including those from the UN).
2007-02-20 05:07:26 · answer #7 · answered by Mr. Info 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think it's enough that you bash the president, don't attempt to speak for him. President Bush is working through the United Nations ( which I believe is a perfectly useless organization), and through diplomacy to resolve issues with Iran. As far as the "Democrats in the House" they are useless as well, they can't make a decision, only pass resolutions. Someone must lead, and it is certainly not our congress.
2007-02-20 05:09:45 · answer #8 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The Bush administration will manufacture a lie to justify attacking Iran.
2007-02-20 04:58:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
They might have to create the stimuli again, but this time there are many more skeptics prepared to do an objective analysis of whatever excuse bush gives for his next invasion.
2007-02-20 05:00:49 · answer #10 · answered by KidDynomite 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋