If Bush bombs Iran, and Iran retaliates against a US city, who will Americans blame?

Question

Isn't it fascinating that people who have been telling us about the "global war on terror" for 6 years now say Iran can't threaten us because it doesn't have ICBMs?

Answer 1

Republicans will blame Iran.

Democrats will blame Bush.

It's pretty simple, actually.

Answer 2

i certainly do no longer see the US bombing Iran decrease than any situations except some thing considerable happens. as some distance through fact the suitcase nukes is going, each nuke has a signature or layout that would tell the place it grow to be made. Iran hasn't detonated any nukes so no signature would desire to be correct to Iran. so which you the two have a suitcase nuke with a signature that doesn't tournament everyone or you have a signature that fits another u . s . a .. How do you link some thing a terrorist does with Iran except you have caught them. There purely too many holes on your scenerio to get the UN to bypass alongside with something and economicly I do exactly no longer see us doing something via ourselves. so some distance as who's difficulty it relatively is? that's certainly the entire worlds difficulty. I choose they might understand it as such. you do no longer enable radicals run unfastened no count number who they're.

Answer 3

If iran manages to reach a US city, that will be a big surprise to me, but I think americans will blame bush no matter what happens. The president always seems to be the scapegoat whenever anything bad happens. Anyway, IF bush decides to bomb Iran, the military will make sure nothing close to a missile or a bomb makes it out of the country, let alone across the ocean.

Answer 4

Iran has no capacity to reach the US.They will try to harm Israel like Iraq did in the Kuwait war.
Americans will blame whoever they are told to blame.Hell a lot still blame Saddam for 9/11

Answer 5

Under the assumption that there was no reason to Bomb Iran, the Government. If Iran continues to threaten to blow Isreal off the face of the map and continues to disobey the orders of countries all over the world, they have brought it against itself.

Answer 6

Bush is not going to bomb Iran unless they do something stupid. Besides, Congress would have to approve of this decision. Now if iran were to make the first strike on a US city or interest, then Congress would be blamed for not allowing the president to prevent this from happening.

Answer 7

Iran would retaliate in Iraq, Sadr city would erupt and Baghdad and the Green Zone will be in flames.

Answer 8

Those who know the truth will blame Bush those who succomb to Administration lies will blame Saddam Hussein. Some how he will come back or they'll say the fellow hanged only looked like Saddam and that he really was behind it.

Answer 9

It will be those pesky Iranians for not lying back and allowing the mighty US to bomb their women, children and grandparents to smitherens.

Do you doubt me? Well, Look at the Iraqi situation. It's not Bush's fault that 700,000 people have died, but those dam n Iraqis for allowing themselves to bombed.


EDIT: Ekim B... but you want us to believe 19 Saudi Arabians attacked NYC, the capital of the USA on 9/11. Jeeeeezzzzzz

Answer 10

That's a pretty big "if". Because Bush is not going to attack Iran. Period.

And also, Iran does not have the capability of attacking the US. It has no intercontinental capability, at least not far enough to hit the US.

So, bada-bing, your scenario shatters.

Answer 11

If we bombed Iran they'd have it coming anyways considering the history between us. Most of you weren't born when Iran took a bunch of hostages back in the late 70's and commited terrorist acts under the Ayatollah