can you "come" without orgasming?

Question

what i mean is could a woman force out "come" without an orgasm

Answer 1

I can only answer for the men - but, for men, it is actually possible to orgasm without coming. It takes a lot of training and is called an internal orgasm - whereby the 'forward' movement of ejaculating is actually reversed. It's an old Chinese practise that dates back 2000 years - in Chinese culture it was considered bad for your health to ejaculate (as they believed that coming actually meant losing you life energy - this life energy was called 'Chi')

A good book to read is "The Multi-Orgasmic Man". It will teach the guys how to do this - as well as to actually have multiple orgasms - which are far stronger and end up affecting the entire body if done correctly!!!

It's pretty amazing ... and guys ... once you learn how to do it ... you'll never look back!

Answer 2

Only about 10 percent of woman actually "ejaculate" when having an orgasm. The natural lubrication that comes from the vagina is not ejaculation. Recent studies actually showed that the female ejaculation is a build up in the uretha and doesn't come intra vaginally at all.

Wow! From all these answers it is really sad how sexually uneducated everyone is. Doesn't anyone read books?

Answer 3

what is you? When you can find the limit of you, then you can find what is beyond you. So the question is: is there a limit to you? I am saying that there is no you at all, because there is no limit to you. It follows that: perception at the time of perceiving is all that exists in the particular. When perception ends, the particular is not: then one is not separate from the universal. Who is to perceive this? Nobody! Perception is the illusion, that which covers the universal. The universal is felt by mind but not known by brain: but what is beyond the universal/everything? Later, thought can operate upon the past memory of the perception, but not upon the origin of the perception itself. Thus brain creates a perception 'of the memory of the perception', which itself becomes a memory. There becomes an internal movement of memory, devoid of link to the universal (actuality). When that ceases, another memory takes its place, or the body operates without thought (as in flight n fight response etc). Without the tree, you would not be, so what are you: a tree? They are the lungs of the world, but without the sun, there would be no oxygen for everyone, so is the tree the sun, and are we all one? All the world is one turning in time. There are so many turns now, after so much time. Now even the turns are so divided, that they cannot see the links between one another. There appears to be many personalities: we say I and he or she, that is like the cell in the left eye calling the cell in the right eye foreign. What thought is there that can bring an end to perception? Is there anything beyond the universal which is beyond perception? When the brain is not active dividing, so the mind can sense the world free, is there anything beyond the world? Thought asks these questions, it is asking is there anything beyond cause! Cause can be found for almost anything in the universe, although there can not be found all the variables in ones lifetime (in theory cause can be found). Beyond cause, is there acausal? If there is acausal, it is the ground from which cause came: something entirely independent, and incorruptable. Is this what cause is after? We have a cause! How can that built by cause be incorruptable? It cannot! When that which has a cause is still (when memory + thought are silent), mind can see further, and staying with that constantly changing movement, the acausal wind maybe felt/tasted. We cannot taste that otherness, it is beyond cause, and we are cause. For us to become still, there has to be an end to hope, which means and end to hopes cause (despair). So despair is why we are searching, and it too is an illusion of thought. Any movement of thought cannot bring an end to despair: stillness of thought ends despair, for it is not felt without movement accross it. As anything we (thought) maintains are own momentum, we (the I) maintains despair. The movement of attention accross the patterns of thought encoding despair causes the pattern of hope to grow away from the pattern of despair, and that movement maintains the feeling of fear. We do not wish to give up fear nor despair, because that would be the end of us. We have been running from the acausal, always. The result is cause. We are not satisfied with cause! Now cause wishes to be acausal... Such a calculation! A man cannot cool without steping out of the fire. The fire is caused by attention (energy of attention) flowing over the patterns of thought within memory. That fire drives more patterns of thought. Attention has no choice, because it is acausal. When in prison, the only way to be free, is to realize there is no you, and let appearences be. A man must first clean his floor, before opening the window to let in the breeze. When you have a clean floor, the room maybe seen, and somewhere the window will become apparent.

Answer 4

Not all women come when they orgasm,,, onl y some actually do that.... what you mean is probably just lubrication.... women have the Skenne gland, which is equivalent to the male prostate, it secretes som lubricant liquid into the urethra during sex, maybe the woman you are talking about is one of these whose secretions from this gland is greater.... they can't force it though.

Answer 5

Lady men come , as in sexual intercourse- women have orgasmic- so if you are a women you do not come- but you release a white substance- come (as in sex/man) -orgasm is different

Answer 6

i dont think so...

you can ejaculate but i always thought that came with the orgasm?

Answer 7

no, you can eject fluids but this is probably not an orgasm, you would know if you had one of those

Answer 8

Yes this is possible. You can ejaculate and not orgasm.

Answer 9

Yeah, I think you can. A misfire. It's a timing thing.

Answer 10

first its c u m, second yea