In f1 would it be more intersting if the faster cars started in back of the grid...??

Question

so there would be more passing?? and maybe that would would make it more appealing to the race fans here in the states..because to me it is boring and more passing would make it more excting than seeing a car that is 15-20 seconds ahead of another

good answers but i thougt F1 quailfies each car for each race..and if they went of the last race the ones that has a DNF the previous race would also have to go back to the end of the field

i miss the days of Jackie Stewart does that tell you anything

Answer 1

definitely. the intensity will heat up and the race will be watched by everyone to see how the champions can make their sleek moves. We can even find a young champion from the slowest of people as they try to overcome the people behind them.

Answer 2

It's an option, but how would you judge which are the fastest cars. No team will go out in qualifying knowing that they will be at the back of the grid if they post the fastest time. You can't use the previous race's results, as a retirement in the last race from a top driver would mean they have an unfair advantage over the previous race winner. F1 has long stood for promoting the best in motor racing and should stay that way. Also, if a good driver was in 10th place towards the end of the race, he may decide to retire to gain a better starting place for the next race.

Answer 3

Listen young man, you shouldn't be watching sports as complex as F1 until you're old enough to understand it. What you suggest is very silly. As you grow up you may realize that it is not all about excitement in F1, it is a very complex sport that goes beyond the race itself. If you are interested in leaning more about F1 you should do some research into the sport and read the books by Steve Matchett.
I understand that a lot of people are not interested in or can't understand the depths and complexities of F1, these people will normally follow the NASCAR series. Not to take anything away from NASCAR, it is what it is. It can be exciting although very shallow.

Answer 4

that is incredibly on the instant to the element. An F1 automobile could be lots swifter than a Moto gp bike. till a moto gp bike is tuned to examine the overall performance of a F1 automobile? that would finally end up with a diverse result.

Answer 5

No, it would only be far more dangerous, and on the top of that it would be unfair, especially on courses on which passing is nearly impossible unless by a grave mistake of the driver ahead.
If you want more passing, some courses must be rebuilt so that passing would become possible, best at three or more places in a turn. That would of course be the end of the GP of Monaco.

Answer 6

so u mean the SUV which pilots the cars should start first and the rest of the racing cars should start afterwards ?

All racing cars in F1 are fast cars and that's why they are there !
Hei kid, the meaning u intend is in the hands of the one who drives it, and not the make of the car. Grow up.

Answer 7

Can you imagine how long it would take for the time trials LOL

Answer 8

f1 would b more interesting if michael schumacher joins it again in ferrari