Lord of the rings or 300? which would be a better film
2007-02-20 03:24:11 · 11 answers · asked by Solving Holmes c 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Guess I'll have to wait and see. LOTR was spectacular. Expect much the same from 300 - at least I hope.
2007-02-20 07:18:51 · answer #1 · answered by Bob Mc 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lord Of The Rings
2007-02-20 11:29:17 · answer #2 · answered by valgal115 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have seen the Lord of the Rings series, but not 300. I loved the book that 300 was based on, a very compelling story.
2007-02-20 11:28:31 · answer #3 · answered by jh 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
300
2007-02-20 11:31:16 · answer #4 · answered by Dro Esquire 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
300
2007-02-20 11:26:58 · answer #5 · answered by αd ισι♪ 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lord of the Rings would be a better film. 300 is too gruesome.
2007-02-20 11:29:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lord of the Rings; most definitely.
2007-02-20 11:27:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i have seen LOTR, and i thought it sucked. 300 looks visually impressive, so i'd say 300.
2007-02-20 11:28:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Jackass 2
2007-02-20 11:39:27 · answer #9 · answered by Captain Tk ($kate Or Die) 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
300 WHOOOOOHOOOOO!
2007-02-20 12:10:46 · answer #10 · answered by Reynolk 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋