Does the Nation-State have a future in the light of globalization?

Answer 1

The Nation-State will survive as a "haven" for human beings. Much like the tribal cultures of our ancient ancestors, which remain in our genetic make up, humans will cling to that "tribal" security and comfort. Economics , though extremely important within the tribal culture, will never be the sole factor to its survival

Answer 2

Yes, very much so. The idea that globalization means the end of the state is based on the mistaken view that globalization is a new phenomenon. It's not. Economic borders have been broken down before. Globalization, at least for Western states has meant breaking down these borders to such an extent that it has become economically and politically advantageous for some Western states to form regional economic and political alliances. Outside of the West, these alliances are more circumspect because globalization has not been a positive force in every area of the world.

Answer 3

Not if the UN-American organization known as the UN has their say about it.

However, considering the recent defeat of the EU Constitution, it appears that even the Europeans are starting to oppose World Government.

I'm certain that nations will survive in the future. World Government is just stupid and nobody's gonna let the UN stick a microchip in them if they've got any sense at all.

Answer 4

Interesting question. In the top 100 economies of the world about 50 are transnational corporations. Nobody voted for them.