to also give up theirs?
Isn't this fair?
Why should the Western World have nuclear energy programs and the capability of producing nukes if Iran can not have the same programs?
2007-02-20 02:18:19 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I've been saying something along those lines for so long. I don't think it's fair to demand someone else do something you're unwilling to do. I bet Bush'll use this as an excuse to enforce that "Axis of Evil" thing he keeps trying to push on people.
Puh-lease. I think we all know the real Axis of Evil isn't in Iran.
2007-02-20 02:23:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Umm- because if countries like Iran have nuclear energy then they have access to nuclear material for bomb making, and that would be bad because they might start handing them out.
And in a country where they have Saturday morning cartoons that teach marterdom- well, it kinda scares me more then Bush being in office.
It is only a matter of time before they get "The Bomb" and when they do we won't even remember 9/11, it will be something worse, something like- "The day we lost NYC."
Bush is a moron, and he has screwed up more then any other leader but he knows that should these people get a weapon like a nuke we are all in deep do-do
2007-02-20 20:16:29 · answer #2 · answered by Harmon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure. Just as soon as Ahmadinutjob can broker complete and verifiable world wide nuclear disarmament I am all for it. And, my basic problem with Iran and nukes is that they are on record as expressing joy at the thought of doing in the entire West and Israel with the damned things. you know, DEATH TO AMERICA, DEATH TO ISRAEL, etc. And all you "American is the problem" folks; feel free to move any time. I won't miss any of you.
2007-02-20 02:53:08 · answer #3 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
US Haven't had a nuclear power plant in 50 years (Thank you Environmental Psychos)
US is not sitting on a lake of crude oil
If Iran is pursuing nuclear energy and not weapons, why not let the UN inspectors inspect their plans?
US did not deny Holocaust
US did not threaten to wipe Israel of the face of the earth
2007-02-20 02:32:01 · answer #4 · answered by Ro! 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
very soon Iran going to proposed to UN members that everyone
is allowed to have 4 nuclear bombs in their army
there is not fair in having or not having the bombs
the only things that justified is not to used it on your enemy at all
2007-02-20 02:36:34 · answer #5 · answered by kimht 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why doesn't Mahmoud Ahmadinejad just buy a finished nuke on the black market? There should be plenty of them around.
Do you think this would make the Hidden Mahdi happy?
(If the Hidden Mahdi does exist, I assume he is a proponent of justice, not indiscriminate slaughter.)
2007-02-20 02:26:07 · answer #6 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think like you, if Iran cannot have nuclear energy, then no one should have it!!
2007-02-20 03:27:26 · answer #7 · answered by ILSE 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Iran threatens to destroy other nations. They are evil life means nothing to them.
2007-02-20 02:48:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Most likely with paranoia and his assertion that what he is doing is right.
My opinion, ALL countries should give up thier nuclear programs.
2007-02-20 02:24:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Same reason why we don't allow everyone to carry guns in public.
Some people have demonstrated they are not responible.
2007-02-20 02:53:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋