It is well known that Global Warming, Global Cooling, or whatever they are calling it this week is junk science more akin to a faith based belief.
The Liberals are so afraid of Global Warming, they believe that sacrificing unborn children will somehow placate Gia (their Earth mother) who is angry because humans have defiled her.
It is kind of like throwing virgins into a volcano. It doesn't do anything, but it makes them feel better about it.
Opinions?
2007-02-20 01:49:25 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Koala has made three reportable offenses:
Not a question or answer
Epithet and Slur
Insulting participants
2007-02-20 01:56:57 · update #1
Maybe you´re right, it´s like going back to a tribal era ..almost the caves. These people still insist in sacrificing innocent kids to their self-made gods...
2007-02-20 01:53:49 · answer #1 · answered by alfonso p 3 · 1⤊ 5⤋
If I truly gave you my honest opinion, I'd be forced to be less than civil, which could get ugly, so instead, I'll go a different route. First of all, Liberals don't "enforce" abortion. The courts simply uphold Roe vs Wade, which Constitutionally makes abortion legal within certain limits.
Second, if global warming is indeed "junk science", then 2400 esteemed scientists are quacks.
Third, Liberals have no agenda to sacrifice unborn children to Gia. The accusation is absurd. Perhaps you were being sarcastic?
2007-02-20 10:13:25 · answer #2 · answered by Hemingway 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. plus the earth is called Gaia, from Greek mythology, Gia was a model
anyway, are you prepared to adopt or foster an unwanted child ? Until you do, you have no credibility.
2007-02-20 09:56:44 · answer #3 · answered by squeegie 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
wow, thats the most ignorant thing I've read to day. How do you go from abortions (the fetus can't survive outside womb so its not murder or any type of killing) to global climate change in the same thought. I have absolutely nothing to say except I could actually feel my brain cells die as I read your question.
2007-02-20 09:59:34 · answer #4 · answered by jwk227 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As a tax lawyer I find your point intriguing, how much do you think we could charge on CO2 emissions emitted through a tax on the regulated throwing of virgins into volcanos?
2007-02-20 09:54:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Abortion is a decision that most women agonize over!
For you to trivialize this is disgusting and completely unwarranted!
Once EVERYONE----including unscrupulous men who want to fornicate but don't want to live with the consequences start taking personal responsibility for their sexual practices abortion will always be in practice!!!
It always has been--- now they have just provided safety for the pregnant woman!!
Are you opposed to safety??
Your theory sucks! And is meant to incite anger and division!
2007-02-20 09:57:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Its liberals calling it global warming? Hmmmm... I thought it was scientists.
2007-02-20 09:53:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think you've spent too much time in the cellar. Your comments are so off base they are impossible to reply to.
2007-02-20 09:55:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
What are you talking about? I'm a liberal and nothing in your insane rant has anything to do with anything I believe in.
2007-02-20 09:52:14 · answer #9 · answered by leaptad 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
That makes no sense.
2007-02-20 09:54:31 · answer #10 · answered by Charles Dexter Ward 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋