English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-20 01:45:20 · 46 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Royalty

46 answers

I definitely wouldn't want to be one of her pads.

2007-02-21 11:52:49 · answer #1 · answered by Dethruhate 5 · 1 0

I agree, its good she and he are finally together, he should have proposed to her earlier instead of letting fate take its course, then they might have been the first couple to not have a divorce, if this is grammatically correct--presumably they are happy together it makes a change from the painful scenes that featured Diana. cam and chars are obviously a perfect match in terms of personality compatibility u name it, oh I agree cam is a bit awkward as depicted by certain international news photographs and hence this skews the views of people against rather than for her, but that is entirely due to being a newbie in the royal family, I wonder how long it actually takes to train up a commoner who marries into royalty (presumably they still do that)

2007-02-21 18:23:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

In the ideal world they would have married when they first fell in love. Diana would never have been famous and probably still alive and Prince Charges and Her Grace Camilla would have been happy and had several children and spent lots of time in the country around their horses.

But the Queen felt Charles was to young to marry back then and did not really approve of her. So lesson. Don't let your mother choose your wife or when you marry or you may not have a lot of happiness in your life.

2007-02-20 18:49:37 · answer #3 · answered by idaho gal 4 · 0 1

you people are quick to judge someone you don't know anything about or never met .typical.and the name is:

( Her Grace) Duchess of Cornwall
Cammila Mountbatten Windsor and when Charles becomes KING she will be (her Grace) the Duchess of Lanchaster.
you got first from a BLAIR!!!!!

2007-02-20 05:52:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I like her. Why do people have this rosie view of Diana? In many ways she was a selfish manipulative woman who courted publicity and humiliated Charles. And lets not forget, if she'd returned home when she SHOULD have and not extended her holiday with her boyfriend (as any mother who cared about,and missed her children would have) she would have been alive today.
Camilla adores Charles and always has. And he adores her too. She is elegant and an asset to the Royals. Wake up and look at the truth for once and try to get it through your heads, Diana is dead and I doubt very much if Camilla, or Charles for that matter,cares that she is "No Diana".

2007-02-20 04:44:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Heeeheeeheee (thats a horse sound by the way,lol lol)...ok in a nutshell she resembles a horse.
SOme say Diana and her are like chalk and cheese, the complete antithesis of each other. This however is a good thing, looks are not the be all (tho they do help), what matters is Charles looks miles happier than he ever did wit that Diana (theres them what say she was a bit of a Hoe...but mustnt spk ill of dcd folk). She keeps the elephant man happy, his kids seem accepting of her, so what does our opinion matter anyways ?!

2007-02-20 08:38:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

She is someone charlie should have had the balls to tell his mother ,


Look you pimp I love her not this Diana girl, so Im going with my girlfriend if you and your laws dont like it go fk a corgi.

If Im gonner be king I aint gonner satnd form pimping and people screwing up lives u *****,


And the rest of the country can take the same as they are acting like pimps and semi rapists.


Thats the girl charlie loves, and loveed, thats the one he should be with...

End of story.

And if that had happend in the first place MS Diana would be alive and happy with her bloke

2007-02-21 19:33:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I would serve at west point military academy in honor of the windsor name,from the date of 1978.

2007-02-20 15:01:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Or Camilla Parker Bowles Saxe Coburg Gotha as she shoud be more formally known.

2007-02-20 10:16:23 · answer #9 · answered by blah de blah de blah... 3 · 1 1

I wasn't keen at first but when you see the pictures of her and Charles over the years it's clear to see how tragic their romance has been.They were obviously in love all those years ago and for whatever reason kept apart. Fortunately for them they have been given a chance at happiness together.

2007-02-20 01:51:46 · answer #10 · answered by heebygeeby 4 · 5 0

She looks a bit horsey, but Charles is no stud muffin. I think they were meant to be, he should never of married Diana, he obviously thinks alot of Camilla. She is his true love, doesn't matter what she looks like, he wanted her, not Diana. Diana was very beautiful and alot of people loved her, she just didn't have the same effect on Charles. The Royals don't really have much bearing on my life, I don't really care what they get up to.

2007-02-20 01:53:17 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers