English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

get off the pot repukes
insurgents are iraqies DOPES

2007-02-20 00:32:31 · 15 answers · asked by DumbsField o 1 in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

And the liberals are doing what to/for them?

2007-02-20 00:35:01 · answer #1 · answered by taxidriver 4 · 3 0

Well.. lets see.. september 11 happens under very dubious conditions.. still dont know why Silverman "pulled" tower 7.. very suspect.. and the petnagon strike is still unresolved too.. and why is it when the pentagon got hit.. all the cases against a bunch of white collar criminals (most of them republicans) had to be dropped since the pentagon strike mysteriously only destroyed those documents..

Then the republicans went ot Iraq to avenge Sept 11.. made a bunch of claims now found ot have been a bunch of lies.. and in the process completely destroyed a sovereign nation.. killing over 3,000 US soldeirs.. and 100,000 Iraqi civilians..

MEANWHILE the republicans have been milking the government coffers out of billions of dollars for no bid re-contruction contracts.. THAT NEVER HAPPENED!!!

So in conclusion.. the republicans are knowingly and willingly killing innocent Iraqis as we speak.. to further enrich themselves only..

If you vote Republican.. then the above is all fine with you.. in which case.. you are a moron!!

OH,.. and for CCguy.. Saddam didnt kill anywhere near 500,000 people.. that's a lie as well.. the truth is though.. that Saddam was put in power by Rumsfeld and Bush Snr after the assasination of the previous Iraqi leader.. and all the weapons and chemicals he ever used.. came from these republicans as well.. so who's more guilty??? The knowing intelligent republicans who KNEW what they were doing.. or the stupid Saddam who was doing what he thought was acceptable at the time.. since the Republicans were seen and photographed shaking his hand AFTER he killed those people????

Republicans vote for free muder.. coz that's what they do best..

2007-02-20 00:41:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

We're saving Iraq from terrorists and insurgents.

Maybe you should get out and talk to the Iraqis....

2007-02-20 00:39:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

We are saving Iraqi's. The insurgents appear to be the ones doing all the killing.

2007-02-20 00:39:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

individuals are killing some Iraqis (occasion association isn't correct) the unhappy element is we are killing extra Iraqis than Saddam could have and not protecting order there almost besides there's an spectacular contradiction in Bush's rhetoric, on one hand he needs us to have confidence we are bringing peace and democracy to Iraq, on the different he needs us to have confidence we are taking the combat to the terrorists (scuffling with in Iraq particularly than the USA), the two he needs conflict there or he needs peace there, he won't be in a position to have it the two methods

2016-12-17 14:31:12 · answer #5 · answered by zabel 4 · 0 0

The Dems have historically been the party of pot.

Even if the insurgents are Iraqis, what's your point? Saddam's army was Iraqi too.

2007-02-20 00:36:00 · answer #6 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 3 0

They are saving Iraq. If not, why do the Iraqi people don't want us to leave?

2007-02-20 00:36:00 · answer #7 · answered by Teresa Ice 1 · 3 1

My students, many Iraqis, 99% very happy with USA help.

2007-02-20 00:59:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Saving Iraq or killing them? Iraq is singular. Sounds like you need some grammar lessons before you come to the US. Stay in Iraq.

2007-02-20 00:35:50 · answer #9 · answered by OwNaGeR 3 · 3 1

What? Are we not allowed to kill terrorists because they are Iraqis? That is a fundamentally absurd notion. It doesn't matter who the terrorists are, what color their skin is or where they live. We need to kill enough of them to break their will to fight, plain and simple.

2007-02-20 00:34:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

There would have been killing under Saddam anyway. Don't forget that they found at least 500,000 killed in mass graves during Saddam's reign of terror. If we leave and there is a civil war, you can count on hundreds of thousands if not millions of deaths.

2007-02-20 00:35:28 · answer #11 · answered by ccguy 3 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers