None of the above, unless he's an emancipated minor. Then he'd be liable for all, if for some reason he was able to get into a country club or summer camp.
2007-02-20 00:32:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by rosecitylady 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i believe that the minor would be most liable for the t-shirt. why not the others, well because no sane salesperson would sell a minor only a car even if it is used. not the country club because usually that is for the enjoyment of adults and the summer camp not because its the parents that send the kids away to those summer camps. if the company for some idiotic reason does make a contract with the minor, then i would believe they are making the parents liable also. but the parents can argue that in court.
2007-02-20 00:33:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by sweetbeba05 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
C
Who would let an average minor join a country club?
The parents are responsible a head of time to pay the camp bill
A bill for a t shirt would be paid by the teen at the store
A average minor can not purchase a car.
2007-02-20 00:31:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sunshine 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think B and C....
what do u mean by average minor? as in 12-16? or 9-11?
i am 14.
2007-02-20 00:34:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
C-a bill for a new T shirt
D-a used car
2007-02-20 00:31:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by shanekeavy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
none D needs a contract...a b c have implied contracts...minors can not be held legally responsible
2007-02-20 00:33:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Robert P 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
All of them if the Court felt they were all for necessaries.
If none of them were considered necessaries - then absolutely none of them.
2007-02-20 00:34:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
c
2007-02-20 00:30:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Duminos 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
all of the above
2007-02-20 00:29:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by PRiNCESS Sarah 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
C
2007-02-20 00:30:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by dgreer58 3
·
0⤊
0⤋