And doesn't it just speak volumes about the task facing the military as people defend their wealth, resource and homeland?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/19/world/middleeast/19oilfields.html?em&ex=1172120400&en=cb52b544afbd621d&ei=5087%0A
2007-02-20 00:25:51 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes it does speak volumes and you seem to say this like protecting the world's oil supply is a bad thing to do??
2007-02-20 00:32:37 · answer #1 · answered by Monte T 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That question is full of communist spin. The fact is that we haven't taken one drop of oil. However, we should be taking all their oil until the war is paid for. Why the hell should the American Taxpayer fund the removal of an evil tyrant and liberty of a country?
2007-02-20 08:32:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
It is just one facet of the war in Iraq. It's not everything. There is nothing to do with oil. Hope you understand what it means!
2007-02-20 08:32:21 · answer #3 · answered by Teresa Ice 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You can't use one pic to describe this war. That's one aspect of this whole thing.
2007-02-20 08:37:27 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
From the NY Times, whose motto is "all the news that fits, we print"? No, it says it fits their propaganda profile.
2007-02-20 08:31:43 · answer #5 · answered by taxidriver 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
occupation?
Hmmmm.... Iraqis are afraid we'll leave
2007-02-20 08:31:36 · answer #6 · answered by Duminos 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋